Originally posted by BigMackCam You make some great points here, most of which I agree with... but my oh my, your delivery sounds awfully grumpy!
As I stated in my post - I have been listening to this ant-MS drivel ever since Windows came out. My work history is being a Windows System Administrator for two Fortune 500 global companies. I have been on several Beta's for MS and I have created system images for SW Engineering teams consisting of thousands of workstations and servers on three continents.
Grumpy? - yeah just a bit. There is nothing wrong with Apple or Linux. Windows is just a Operating System like OSX or Linux.
P.S. Of the seven devices I have running Windows - only two will pass the test for Windows 11. I am not happy, but I am not going to go make stuff up to vent about it.
---------- Post added 10-01-21 at 10:12 PM ----------
Originally posted by Denver In the past, Microsoft worked to ensure that new versions of windows work with old hardware and software. With this new version they have abandoned that and have refused to work with old hardware. For us home users we will suck it up and somewhere in the future will be using Windows 11. I support many small businesses as their IT person and have done that for 20 years. Many have very specialized software for their business. Replacing one to keep Redmond happy is workable but when you have 25 computers and software to replace to keep Redmond happy because they refuse to support legacy hardware with this release (which is arbitrary as the beta testing was done on older hardware by beta testers without issues) it becomes a deal-breaker. Windows 11 will be a hard sell for the business community and their IT support teams. Yes, I will delay my install of Windows 11 till everyone else has fought all the bugs and non-compatibility issues it will bring. Many of the small businesses I support have decided that they will not be upgrading as the cost is too high and will look at other operating systems in the future. There is a reason that Unix and Linex Linux (Fixed that for you) are still around and widely used. As end users, we can always vote with our wallets. And no I did not tell my business to not use Windows 11 they made their choices after talking with the developers of the highly specialized software they use (many which cost 25 to 30000 a copy).
The companies I worked for leased their devices. Not a problem, they just roll the new devices in as the costs/hardware failures occur. In the business world hardware capitalization is a known function. If you do not let your customers know, then you are not doing a very good job.
As for specialized software, yup that happens. We had a soldering machine that ran on OS/2 in 2009 and there were a few Windows 95 boxes hidden away to support some old devices. This is nothing new. The pressure should be on the vendor to provide software that runs on the current OS. unless - the company is too cheap to pay for current software, the vendor adds "features" that are garbage or the company is getting by on the "cheap" (not buying upgrades or new licenses). And yes, I have had instances of all three of these cases.
As for UNIX - well, geez perhaps you should talk to someone who had to work with UNIX from two vendors, say HP-UX and AIX (from IBM). I remember UNIX admins pulling out their hair because they had to re-write all of their scripts due to "inconsistencies" between the UNIX versions. UNIX is not as universal as you think, same thing goes for Linux based OS's. Your mileage will vary.
---------- Post added 10-01-21 at 10:12 PM ----------
Originally posted by Denver In the past, Microsoft worked to ensure that new versions of windows work with old hardware and software. With this new version they have abandoned that and have refused to work with old hardware. For us home users we will suck it up and somewhere in the future will be using Windows 11. I support many small businesses as their IT person and have done that for 20 years. Many have very specialized software for their business. Replacing one to keep Redmond happy is workable but when you have 25 computers and software to replace to keep Redmond happy because they refuse to support legacy hardware with this release (which is arbitrary as the beta testing was done on older hardware by beta testers without issues) it becomes a deal-breaker. Windows 11 will be a hard sell for the business community and their IT support teams. Yes, I will delay my install of Windows 11 till everyone else has fought all the bugs and non-compatibility issues it will bring. Many of the small businesses I support have decided that they will not be upgrading as the cost is too high and will look at other operating systems in the future. There is a reason that Unix and Linex Linux (Fixed that for you) are still around and widely used. As end users, we can always vote with our wallets. And no I did not tell my business to not use Windows 11 they made their choices after talking with the developers of the highly specialized software they use (many which cost 25 to 30000 a copy).
The companies I worked for leased their devices. Not a problem, they just roll the new devices in as the costs/hardware failures occur. In the business world hardware capitalization is a known function. If you do not let your customers know, then you are not doing a very good job.
As for specialized software, yup that happens. We had a soldering machine that ran on OS/2 in 2009 and there were a few Windows 95 boxes hidden away to support some old devices. This is nothing new. The pressure should be on the vendor to provide software that runs on the current OS. unless - the company is too cheap to pay for current software, the vendor adds "features" that are garbage or the company is getting by on the "cheap" (not buying upgrades or new licenses). And yes, I have had instances of all three of these cases.
As for UNIX - well, geez perhaps you should talk to someone who had to work with UNIX from two vendors, say HP-UX and AIX (from IBM). I remember UNIX admins pulling out their hair because they had to re-write all of their scripts due to "inconsistencies" between the UNIX versions. UNIX is not as universal as you think, same thing goes for Linux based OS's. Your mileage will vary.
With reference to your first line, yes MS has gone out of its way to be backwards compatible. However, you can read - on this site - where that has not worked out all that well. Furthermore, if you follow the thinking is some quarters, MS is so full of backwards compatible vulnerabilities that the who thing should be thrown out (Linux users love to rant about this). I think it is time to move on.