Originally posted by Wheatfield That's probably just replacing one form of hell for another. If the landlord lets the property go into forclosure, the bank isn't going to honour the agreement, so you get to sue a landlord who is probably broke too, with all the financial obligations and personal stress that goes along with it.
It's just a really crappy situation, and honestly, I think your governments should be bailing out people in the OP's situation before they bail out Wall Street.
At least this would be helping the victims rather than rewarding the predators.
On the contrary, if you have a lease with a foreclosure clause you have a valid, enforceable contract.
Neither the buyer of the foreclosed property (nor the bank) can evict you before performance of the lease is completed.
If you are moth-to-month, your lease is performed at the end of each month, That is the risk you take when you cannot commit to a term lease - the benefit is you can move with 30 days' notice.
And believe me, if you own stick in Citigroup or stock options you haven't been bailed out at all $57 to $0.97 in 17 months ain't a bailout..