Is it sustainable? Or will we still be paying for this "upturn".
Quote: It was also driven by government programs like the popular discount on some new motor vehicle purchases, which stimulated auto sales and production, and a $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers.
The auto discount program ended in August and the home tax credit is due to expire next month. In the absence government support, there are fears that the sprouting economic recovery could falter, with rising unemployment also inflicting damage.
A separate report from the Labor Department showed the number of U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless benefits dipped by 1,000 last week to 530,000 last week.
Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast claims to fall to 521,000 last week from 531,000.
When the last of the money giveaways end will we be better or worse? Have we really spurred the economy or have people just gotten into debt more?
I'll still stand by the prediction I made in the "Predictions" thread. So far I am correct.
Quote: I think it will pick up through the end of the year then tank after January 2010. It will start up again 1st, maybe 2nd quarter of 2011.
And lets not forget this article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091029/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/us_economy;_ylt=A0LEap...Nvbm9teWdyb3dp Quote: Fueled by government stimulus, the economy grew last quarter for the first time in more than a year. The question now is, can the recovery last?
Federal support for spending on cars and homes drove the economy up 3.5 percent from July through September. But the government aid — from tax credits for home buyers to rebates for auto purchases — is only temporary. Consumer spending, which normally drives recoveries, is likely to weaken without it.
If shoppers retrench in the face of rising joblessness and tight credit, the fragile recovery could tip back into recession.
Even this part of the liberal media gets it.
Quote: Consumer spending, which normally drives recoveries,
Not government handouts.
But let's give the big O credit, since we are out of the recession let's not spend the other 90% of the stimulus. And we shouldn't really need the third one thay are talking about now should we. And contrary to what Barney Frank says lets actually put the repaid money back were it was suppose to go instead of spending it like he wants to do.
For the record I don't blame the Obama for the recession. It started before Bush.
And for your reading pleasure on the stimulus jobs:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091029/ap_on_bi_ge/us_stimulus_jobs_13