I'm worried about you Ratlady...that was well written and clear as the sunny day I am viewing out my office window........65F and rising!

You are also absolutely right, but won't sell it here. These lap doggies think that if they have a few dollars in their wallet and a six pack of Bud, they are doing just as well as the Fat Cats that suck them dry. They work their asses off at pathetically low paying jobs but contribute to the Christmas Fund for a gift for their mighty CEO that is only going to get a measly bonus of $250 Million this year. You can't help them, just as the Britt pointed out, they have shit for brains. ( I wish I could have said that!)
Regards& Hope you get to feeling better Ratlady, I just got my Buck Rogers Decipher Machine back from the shop and need to test it out....you didn't help me any with this post....but I have confidence in you!
Rupert

So really Rupert you just mind that it's the Republicans (well in your mind anyway) taking your money. It's ok for the Donkey's to soak us with all this debt and taxation though?

[Rupert]

So really Rupert you just mind that it's the Republicans (well in your mind anyway) taking your money. It's ok for the Donkey's to soak us with all this debt and taxation though?

Biggest deficit in history...biggest monetary loss in stock market history.....biggest tax cut for the rich in history for Fat Cats......biggest loss of homes in history.......all from your boy Jesus George...and you want to preach to me Graphic? I'll give you another biggest...biggest hypocrites in history. If you could only read instead of depending on FIX News for your "facts"....
Regards!

Biggest deficit in history...biggest monetary loss in stock market history.....biggest tax cut for the rich in history for Fat Cats......biggest loss of homes in history.......all from your boy Jesus George...and you want to preach to me Graphic? I'll give you another biggest...biggest hypocrites in history. If you could only read instead of depending on FIX News for your "facts"....
Regards!

You may want to rethink your post. Let's not forget that The Big O is spending more than all 43 of his predecessors. Combined.

The White House and the Congressional Budget Office will both release their financial budget estimates on Aug. 25 and there's good news and bad news. The good news is that the Obama Administration has scaled back its estimate of this year's budget deficit to an estimated $1.58 trillion (down from $1.84 trillion in May). The bad news is that this is by far the largest budget shortfall in U.S. history — nearly $900 billion more than last year's deficit — and it accounts for 11.2% of GDP, the largest percentage since 1945. It's more money than we have circulating in actual currency and if added to the national debt, it will raise the tally by 13%. (To understand debt vs. deficit, think of a credit card: debt is the outstanding balance on the card while the deficit is the amount added each fiscal year.) At this rate, the Administration estimates that the U.S. could face a cumulative $9 trillion in deficits over the next decade — $2 trillion more than previously thought.

[flyer]

You may want to rethink your post. Let's not forget that The Big O is spending more than all 43 of his predecessors. Combined.

Unfortunately, that's what it cost to fix George W. (weasel) Bush sh!t.

Yves, stick to printing. Cause you know little of history. This financial mess rests upon the donkey.

[brecklundin]

You may want to rethink your post. Let's not forget that The Big O is spending more than all 43 of his predecessors. Combined.

So, where should the cash go? Other countries? Better to spend on rebuilding the US than rebuilding Guadulawhothehellcares. Or spending it on blowing up sheep and goats and brown people in general around the globe.

So, where should the cash go? Other countries? Better to spend on rebuilding the US than rebuilding Guadulawhothehellcares. Or spending it on blowing up sheep and goats and brown people in general around the globe.

See now that's the problem. No one knows where the money really goes. They don't want you to know. That's why they hide it in the healthcare bill, the defense bill etc.

[Rupert]

See now that's the problem. No one knows where the money really goes. They don't want you to know. That's why they hide it in the healthcare bill, the defense bill etc.

Hmmm.....I think a few hundred Billion went to your Fat Cat friends on Wall Street....I'm trying to remember who started that ball rolling.....can you help me out Graphic? Now at the time, they offered us up the "where the money really goes" one page request for almost a Trillion dollars....so your guys are really great at identifying "where it really goes"....am I right again? Thought so......Graphic, get another set, one that is not limited to FIX News and you won't be caught red faced with things like this.
Regards!

Hmmm.....I think a few hundred Billion went to your Fat Cat friends on Wall Street....I'm trying to remember who started that ball rolling.....can you help me out Graphic? Now at the time, they offered us up the "where the money really goes" one page request for almost a Trillion dollars....so your guys are really great at identifying "where it really goes"....am I right again? Thought so......Graphic, get another set, one that is not limited to FIX News and you won't be caught red faced with things like this.
Regards!

Sure. W started the ball rolling. I was against tarpulus. Pelosi of course added 150 billion in pork to that also.

The Obama nation hasn't spent but about 20% of his crapulus money yet was looking for a third. So if the recession is over and we've only spent 20% why don't they return the 80%?

Why did Barney Frank want to divert the repayment away from the GF?

[Rupert]

Graphic, it is admirable that "I was against tarpulus." ...and so was I , but this is not what we are for/against it is about what was actually done, and I find it curious that you want to slam the Democrats while avoiding the facts of what your guys have contributed to this whole bungling wreck. If you and I were running things, we might fight a little, but we would do a hell of a lot better job than either George or Obama. So which one of us gets top spot on the ticket?
Regards!

Graphic, it is admirable that "I was against tarpulus." ...and so was I , but this is not what we are for/against it is about what was actually done, and I find it curious that you want to slam the Democrats while avoiding the facts of what your guys have contributed to this whole bungling wreck. If you and I were running things, we might fight a little, but we would do a hell of a lot better job than either George or Obama. So which one of us gets top spot on the ticket?
Regards!

I slam the jack asses because they have the majority of the responsibility for this financial fiasco. And all though the repubicans did add a touch of pork Stretch Pelosi added 99% of it to tarpulus.

I get top billing.

[Wheatfield]

Yves, stick to printing. Cause you know little of history. This financial mess rests upon the donkey.

Or at least it happened on his watch.
You guys have a systemic problem. It's not limited to one party or the other.
You have the Republicans screwing up the finances when they are in power, so you elect a Democrat who wags his finger at the Republicans and then spends a bunch of money, so you then elect a Republican who wags his finger at the Democrats, and then spends a bunch of money.
And you all get on board, blaming the other guy for the problem, when the reality is, they are all a bunch of screw ups.
And it never occurs to anyone to just demand better.
This is the stupidity of mindless partisanship, and no one does it better than you guys.
If it's your guy doing it, it must be right, if it's your country doing it (especially if you've involved your armed forces) it must be right, and anyone who dares to disagree is either a libtard or a contard (depending on whose dick you happen to be sucking), or else they are a terrorist sympathizer if they happen to disagree with what you are using your military for and that's the dick you are sucking (and you all seem to like to wrap your lips around that one).
The latter is the scariest because that lack of critical thinking involves killing innocent people.
It would be really funny if it was a Seinfeld episode, but because it's reality, it's just pathetic.

Or at least it happened on his watch.
You guys have a systemic problem. It's not limited to one party or the other.
You have the Republicans screwing up the finances when they are in power, so you elect a Democrat who wags his finger at the Republicans and then spends a bunch of money, so you then elect a Republican who wags his finger at the Democrats, and then spends a bunch of money.
And you all get on board, blaming the other guy for the problem, when the reality is, they are all a bunch of screw ups.
And it never occurs to anyone to just demand better.
This is the stupidity of mindless partisanship, and no one does it better than you guys.
If it's your guy doing it, it must be right, if it's your country doing it (especially if you've involved your armed forces) it must be right, and anyone who dares to disagree is either a libtard or a contard (depending on whose dick you happen to be sucking), or else they are a terrorist sympathizer if they happen to disagree with what you are using your military for and that's the dick you are sucking (and you all seem to like to wrap your lips around that one).
The latter is the scariest because that lack of critical thinking involves killing innocent people.
It would be really funny if it was a Seinfeld episode, but because it's reality, it's just pathetic.

So you don't know history either. This mess started with the peanut head farmer. Clinton exacerbated it. In 2003 W tried to rein it in. Many, many posts have links to the facts. Go search for them and learn.

As for your references to oral sex, come on, grow up.

And remember Slick bombed countries whenever an intern was with the cigar.

[Wheatfield]

So you don't know history either. This mess started with the peanut head farmer. Clinton exacerbated it. In 2003 W tried to rein it in. Many, many posts have links to the facts. Go search for them and learn.

There were what, 5 Republican terms after Carter and 2 Democratic terms?
Regan had 2 terms, Shrub Sr had a term and Shrub Jr had a couple of terms.
It doesn't speak well for Republicans if they can't keep things running the way you want when they are in office for 28 years compared to 8 years of Democratic presidents.
In fact, to one who doesn't automatically pick up anyones bags, it actually kinda looks like the Republicans were probably just as bad, if not worse than the Democrats.

As for your references to oral sex, come on, grow up.

Not in this lifetime.
Won't happen.
I like being offensive.

And remember Slick bombed countries whenever an intern was with the cigar.

I think it's safe to say that we can agree that one thing US presidents like to do is order in the bombers for diplomatic missions.

[Ratmagiclady]

I'm worried about you Ratlady...that was well written and clear as the sunny day I am viewing out my office window........65F and rising!

You are also absolutely right, but won't sell it here. These lap doggies think that if they have a few dollars in their wallet and a six pack of Bud, they are doing just as well as the Fat Cats that suck them dry. They work their asses off at pathetically low paying jobs but contribute to the Christmas Fund for a gift for their mighty CEO that is only going to get a measly bonus of $250 Million this year. You can't help them, just as the Britt pointed out, they have shit for brains. ( I wish I could have said that!)
Regards& Hope you get to feeling better Ratlady, I just got my Buck Rogers Decipher Machine back from the shop and need to test it out....you didn't help me any with this post....but I have confidence in you!
Rupert

Well, Rupert, I can't help but notice that my alleged 'incomprehensibility' only seems to come up when I'm disagreeing with certain things.


I think people forget that all this 'spending' that's considered 'bad and socialist' when it's for something progressive, and 'necessary' when it goes to give the big corporations further advantage... *goes somewhere.*

It doesn't go down a hole and *disappear*... (until it eventually goes to Wall Street, anyway) ...if social services go to heating assistance, the *oil company gets paid.* If it goes to medicine, the for-profit health industry gets paid.

Frankly, the more progressive something is, the better a chance *smaller* businesses have of getting a cut. Sending it straight to the top to be bet on the markets, as pretty much happened with Bush's war spending and privileges for the wealthy, means things don't *move,* as we've seen.