Originally posted by larryinlc You're willing to dismiss Al Gore's opinion as junk but then deem credible the viewpoint of a man with nothing more than a degree in journalism? I'm not choosing any side here but I'll take Mr Coleman's stance with a grain of salt. He's been on the show & tell circuit for the past few years and I suspect he's also made a fair amount of money taking the other side if the climate change coin.
Larry
I'm not giving Coleman any credit. But that's just the point, Albert Arnold Gores mantra is just his opinion which has been shown to have some major scientific flaws. On top of that, he has been linked with some major water pollution related to his mining interests. Furthermore, he is a 2-bit lawyer and over priced politician. I regret ever voting for the fop.
Edit: However, people tried to give Bore more credit than Dr. Gray when it came to hurricanes and global warming. Bore's credibility is based on a Nobel Peace Prize which really doesn't have jack to do with science.