Originally posted by ve2vfd
I believe it's holding up the track...
And for those who think they should have padded the steel posts, at 140 km/h it makes no difference if you hit a bare steel post, a padded one or one made of Jello...
Most people in cars with seat belts, air bags and a crumple zone do not survive a head on collision in a concrete wall at 90 mph... imagine the same crash without the car and it's protective features.
Pat
pads do in some way provide a cushion or absorb the force of the impact, no matter how fast you are going. a clear example are those protective barriers that are used in car racing. I'm a huge F1 follower and saw the tragic death of Senna. after his death, the FIA made some revisions with concerns to safety barriers on the track. such improvement did in fact decreased the number or chances of fatality in racing.
I do agree with some of the posters here questioning the logic of such post construction at a crucial turn without any safety measures or had been created in a way to give enough space or room for the installation of impact barriers.
come to think of it, why do hockey players wear helmets and protective pads if they don't make a difference at all?
the answer is they do make a difference. it may not produce a 100% effectivity but it does it's job in decreasing the chances of fatality.
btw, when I saw the video, the first thing that crossed my mind is why the hell are those posts even there or why isn't there any safety barriers of some sort. clearly it's pure common sense.