Originally posted by lurchlarson Overall the earth is warming. I personally don't disagree about that.
I however find it incredibly arrogant that people think that global warming is of primarily anthropological origin. The earth has always gone through warming and cooling cycles.
It's actually arrogant to think one can wish away the effects of doing in a hundred years what took millions to 'un-do.'
We know what these gases do. We know how much we've introduced into the atmosphere. It's not a question of 'arrogance,' (Of all people on this board, I think I can say I have quite a lot more respect for Mammagaia than any denier here...)
It's really about *rate of change.* Rate of change faster than life can adapt=Extinction level event. Which is already underway.
Quote: I don't know that hamstringing economies is the proper course of action and I don't know that even if everyone ran off solar power and bicycles that we could even stop the temperature fluctuations.
This is a false presumption: in fact, just on economics, the fossil fuel economy is tanking... Serving fewer and fewer except for certain moneyed interests. Climate change problems don't say we should do anything we otherwise shouldn't do anyway.
To be quite honest, we aren't actually at a point of 'stopping' *anything.* The time for that was some time ago. We're talking mitigation, here.
Quote: The best course of action is to start learning to adapt and watch out for the wars to come from the displaced people.
Conflict is pretty inevitable. We don't need any more than necessary, though. This is a time for profound cooperation.
Denial.. In either respect, kills. And will kill.
Quote: I am in support of smart environmental protection because I don't want to breath stinky air, get cancer from the ground and have my drinking water destroy my liver. I do want a job though.
The moneyed interests have been claiming that devastating the environment and stalling progress would 'save jobs.'
Notice anything about the job situation lately?