But let's get back to the OP here, George...
The argument you've put forth in this thread is actually a clasically liberal argument in one of the ways you usually hate most:
Despite the fact that, worldwide, consumers have de facto decided that Chinese goods are a better value proposition than goods made elsewhere (i.e., the free market has given them a place of prominence), you want to boycott them because of their abuses to human rights, even if these abuses are in no way directly connected to their manufacturing prowess.
This is interesting, George. I think you might be changing sides.
---------- Post added 04-01-2010 at 09:13 AM ----------
Originally posted by Green_Manelishi True that. And because current conventional "wisdom" insists there are no objective truths (and therefor no accompanying rights or wrongs) who are we to say their dumping baby-bodies is a baaaaadddddd thing? After all, abortion is legal in the US, is it not? Oh, wait, an aborted baby is not really a person, correct?
I mean, on an objective level, what you do with a body after it's dead is purely a matter of your personal superstitions, or what you feel is appropriate in terms of "respect" for the dead.
I wouldn't equate this to abortion, since in this case (at least from the article in the OP), they're simply disposing of the bodies of babies who have died from natural causes, albeit in a way that's distasteful to us.