Originally posted by GeneV Not sure what you are saying about this, but Baylor is consistently ranked in the top quarter for academics, and the medicine and law schools are even better. They have not, in the past, taught religion as science. Nor is it a bible college, but a Christian university that attempts to excel outside of ideology--at least historically.
That's fine, I was just addressing an insistence that "Harvard and any other university I don't approve of is 'Liberal Indoctrination,' which would justify some kind of 'counter-indoctrination indoctrination.'"
Also, of course, that a lot of the *bad science* used to justify what conservative 'think tanks' want to pass off as 'Christianity' and 'Scienceyness' does in fact come from certain schools with certain affiliations that don't have anywhere near the same kind of credentials or weight in terms of science. Not that every Harvard student is some kind of genius or anything. Certainly not a 'flaming liberal.'
Also, I've picked up on that it's your alma mater, there, and, I'm very sorry to hear you were adversely affected by that 'schism' I mentioned, and how the politics have turned. Though that's kind of the point.
A Christian minister *I've* known well was affected by a similar breakup of a sort of confederation of some kind of Protestant churches, some years ago, ...Ironically-enough, I believe, for someone else being too pluralistic and consorting with queers and Pagans. I'm blanking on the names involved. (edit: I *stil* can't remember the names involved: they weren't well-known, but fairly widespread: they were organized around local autonomy and some kind of theological maxim about such autonomy: result: lots of the sorta neocon Evangelical types and some more progressive/open/accepting ...the name was very generic. Wasn't the UCC, which had a similar division as I recall. )
But this is in fact where politicizing things goes.