Your latest acquisition

D1N0 · 03-24-2023, 02:17 PM

Originally posted by WPRESTO

I had a two-tone 135mm f3.5 pre-set Takumar for my Asahi Pentax S. At the time I thought it had excellent IQ. If the "super" version is the same, it should provide fine images even by modern expectations.

I have almost all of them now Takumar Duo tone, single tone, Auto Takumar, Super-Takumar in both versions. Super-Multi-coated Takumar, SMC Pentax. Just missing the silver tele-takumar for the Asahiflex.

**mlag** · 03-24-2023, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by lmd91343

Just got a 15-30 Pentax zoom. I’ve used it on my K1 II. I don’t know how I can ever go back to apsc again!

With a Sigma 10-20 hsm zoom lens?

**mlag** · 03-24-2023, 03:03 PM - **5 Likes**

GODOX Lux senior retro flash. No pTTL. Semi automatic by in-flash sensor or manual, like in the old days.
On K-3II it works, next testing on a ME ...
This flash asks for a vintage camera (pentax new film camera project...?).

**WPRESTO** · 03-25-2023, 05:07 AM

Originally posted by D1N0

I have almost all of them now Takumar Duo tone, single tone, Auto Takumar, Super-Takumar in both versions. Super-Multi-coated Takumar, SMC Pentax. Just missing the silver tele-takumar for the Asahiflex.

Do you know if they are all the same optical formula? If there is one that's different, I would immediately suspect the original tele-Takumar. Among those early lenses I think that the 200mm f5.6 is also regarded as a very good lens.

**lmd91343** · 03-25-2023, 10:02 AM

Originally posted by mlag

With a Sigma 10-20 hsm zoom lens?

That is a nice lens. I have and I’ve used it a lot on my K3. I also have the 8-16 and used to have the slower 10-20. The color, DR, resolution, and general IQ of the K1 II 15-30 combo exceeds any of the aforementioned K3 combinations just from my bench testing, testing around my yard, and a single trip to Joshua NP.

I have not had much testing or experience with my K3 III 11-18 combo. I will be running a series of tests with the 11-18 vs 10-20 vs 8-16.

D1N0 · 03-25-2023, 01:33 PM - **2 Likes**

Originally posted by WPRESTO

Do you know if they are all the same optical formula? If there is one that's different, I would immediately suspect the original tele-Takumar. Among those early lenses I think that the 200mm f5.6 is also regarded as a very good lens.

All the early variations up until the first version of the Super-Takumar are 5 element with a cemented rear element. From then on they are 4 element with a single rear element. Main difference is the coatings I like the early ones better than the late ones.

**cdd29** · 03-25-2023, 04:49 PM - **7 Likes**

My 'native' camera shop (one of 4 within an hour drive) had their semi anual junk sale & I was nearby & my schedule allowed me to stop in, which originally I didn't think I could. I originally went in for some old M42 bellows I saw on their website. Not only did I pick those up at a 10% discount, but I also found a lonely K-X sitting misplaced in a bin of random parts. I figured I could use the screws out of it as they seem to always be falling out of my K-1. Guy said eh, $5 (the sale was $10 per box load of stuff.) Well, I got home tonight & put some batteries in it... IT WORKS!!!!! They said it didn't.

Attached Images

View Picture EXIF

View Picture EXIF

Gary H Perth · 03-25-2023, 05:57 PM

Originally posted by WPRESTO

Do you know if they are all the same optical formula? If there is one that's different, I would immediately suspect the original tele-Takumar. Among those early lenses I think that the 200mm f5.6 is also regarded as a very good lens.

I have a Tele-takumar 200mm f5.6 and its a great lens, sharp across the range of focal distances, including at infinity and wide open. I have an original Pentax metal screw-in lens hood.

I also recently picked up an Auto-Takumar 55mm f2.2 with a cocking lever, and that's also extremely sharp lens. It's a 46mm thread, so I have adapted a 49mm screw-in hood.

For the old Taks, I almost always use as long a hood as will avoid vignetting, that partly compensates for the older coatings.

WhatsMyNameAD67 · 03-25-2023, 06:05 PM

Originally posted by cdd29

My 'native' camera shop (one of 4 within an hour drive) had their semi anual junk sale & I was nearby & my schedule allowed me to stop in, which originally I didn't think I could. I originally went in for some old M42 bellows I saw on their website. Not only did I pick those up at a 10% discount, but I also found a lonely K-X sitting misplaced in a bin of random parts. I figured I could use the screws out of it as they seem to always be falling out of my K-1. Guy said eh, $5 (the sale was $10 per box load of stuff.) Well, I got home tonight & put some batteries in it... IT WORKS!!!!! They said it didn't.

Sweet! Nice find!

**pepperberry farm** · 03-25-2023, 07:14 PM - **1 Like**

one Topcor Auto RE 5.8cm f1.4

gatorguy · 03-26-2023, 09:25 AM

Originally posted by pepperberry farm

one Topcor Auto RE 5.8cm f1.4

I had considered findign the 1.8 version, but I've not followed thru. Whether one is better than the other on FF depends on which one the reviewer chose, or have you now used both?

Oh, and I have a new, still in the box and never opened, FA35 2.0 on the way for the K1 mono.

**pepperberry farm** · 03-26-2023, 09:37 AM

Originally posted by gatorguy

I had considered findign the 1.8 version, but I've not followed thru. Whether one is better than the other on FF depends on which one the reviewer chose, or have you now used both?

Oh, and I have a new, still in the box and never opened, FA35 2.0 on the way for the K1 mono.

I have the later tribute lens, made by Cosina, but no other Topcons (yet) - I had to also buy an adapter so I can use the RE 5.8....

tim60 · 03-26-2023, 10:45 AM

Originally posted by WhatsMyNameAD67

Sweet! Nice find!

Do you mean “near but oh so far”?

**Digitalis** · 03-28-2023, 02:26 AM - **2 Likes**

Spotted a Nikon DF in the local camera shop today, it must be the first second hand one I have seen in YEARS...I have to say it is a visually appealing camera particularly to my aesthetic sensibilities, the price is also very tempting.

**richard0170** · 03-28-2023, 02:30 AM

Originally posted by Digitalis

Spotted a Nikon DF in the local camera shop today, it must be the first second hand one I have seen in YEARS...I have to say it is a very appealing camera. The price is very tempting.

Make sure you get a good feel of it before you commit to buying. I got rid of mine after a few months, as I found it horrible to actually use, though I loved the IQ and it was ideal for MF Nikon glass.

03-28-2023, 02:26 AM - 2 Likes	#26129
Digitalis Site Supporter Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Melbourne, Victoria Photos: Gallery Posts: 11,694	Spotted a Nikon DF in the local camera shop today, it must be the first second hand one I have seen in YEARS...I have to say it is a visually appealing camera particularly to my aesthetic sensibilities, the price is also very tempting. Last edited by Digitalis; 03-28-2023 at 02:32 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
recent acquisition [pics + question]	irishwhite	Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras	19	03-09-2010 08:59 AM
DA 55-300mm F4-F5.8 - New acquisition!	legacyb4	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	35	09-27-2009 03:13 PM
Body acquisition overachievement - what to sell?	grainbelt	Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras	10	02-16-2009 11:42 PM
Suggestions on flash acquisition	Whatabirdie	Pentax DSLR Discussion	1	06-23-2008 07:41 PM
Lens Acquisition	KFrog	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	11	01-23-2007 08:18 PM

03-24-2023, 02:17 PM	#26116
D1N0 Pentaxian Join Date: May 2012 Location: --- Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,802	Originally posted by WPRESTO I had a two-tone 135mm f3.5 pre-set Takumar for my Asahi Pentax S. At the time I thought it had excellent IQ. If the "super" version is the same, it should provide fine images even by modern expectations. I have almost all of them now Takumar Duo tone, single tone, Auto Takumar, Super-Takumar in both versions. Super-Multi-coated Takumar, SMC Pentax. Just missing the silver tele-takumar for the Asahiflex.

03-24-2023, 02:32 PM	#26117
mlag Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2021 Location: Zuiderkempen - Grote Netewoud - Belgium Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 1,410	Originally posted by lmd91343 Just got a 15-30 Pentax zoom. I’ve used it on my K1 II. I don’t know how I can ever go back to apsc again! With a Sigma 10-20 hsm zoom lens?

03-25-2023, 05:07 AM	#26119
WPRESTO Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Massachusetts Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 59,138	Originally posted by D1N0 I have almost all of them now Takumar Duo tone, single tone, Auto Takumar, Super-Takumar in both versions. Super-Multi-coated Takumar, SMC Pentax. Just missing the silver tele-takumar for the Asahiflex. Do you know if they are all the same optical formula? If there is one that's different, I would immediately suspect the original tele-Takumar. Among those early lenses I think that the 200mm f5.6 is also regarded as a very good lens.

03-25-2023, 10:02 AM	#26120
lmd91343 Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA USA Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 1,027	Originally posted by mlag With a Sigma 10-20 hsm zoom lens? That is a nice lens. I have and I’ve used it a lot on my K3. I also have the 8-16 and used to have the slower 10-20. The color, DR, resolution, and general IQ of the K1 II 15-30 combo exceeds any of the aforementioned K3 combinations just from my bench testing, testing around my yard, and a single trip to Joshua NP. I have not had much testing or experience with my K3 III 11-18 combo. I will be running a series of tests with the 11-18 vs 10-20 vs 8-16.

03-25-2023, 01:33 PM - 2 Likes	#26121
D1N0 Pentaxian Join Date: May 2012 Location: --- Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,802	Originally posted by WPRESTO Do you know if they are all the same optical formula? If there is one that's different, I would immediately suspect the original tele-Takumar. Among those early lenses I think that the 200mm f5.6 is also regarded as a very good lens. All the early variations up until the first version of the Super-Takumar are 5 element with a cemented rear element. From then on they are 4 element with a single rear element. Main difference is the coatings I like the early ones better than the late ones.

03-25-2023, 05:57 PM	#26123
Gary H Perth Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: Floreat Posts: 623	Originally posted by WPRESTO Do you know if they are all the same optical formula? If there is one that's different, I would immediately suspect the original tele-Takumar. Among those early lenses I think that the 200mm f5.6 is also regarded as a very good lens. I have a Tele-takumar 200mm f5.6 and its a great lens, sharp across the range of focal distances, including at infinity and wide open. I have an original Pentax metal screw-in lens hood. I also recently picked up an Auto-Takumar 55mm f2.2 with a cocking lever, and that's also extremely sharp lens. It's a 46mm thread, so I have adapted a 49mm screw-in hood. For the old Taks, I almost always use as long a hood as will avoid vignetting, that partly compensates for the older coatings.

03-25-2023, 06:05 PM	#26124
WhatsMyNameAD67 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Posts: 307	Originally posted by cdd29 My 'native' camera shop (one of 4 within an hour drive) had their semi anual junk sale & I was nearby & my schedule allowed me to stop in, which originally I didn't think I could. I originally went in for some old M42 bellows I saw on their website. Not only did I pick those up at a 10% discount, but I also found a lonely K-X sitting misplaced in a bin of random parts. I figured I could use the screws out of it as they seem to always be falling out of my K-1. Guy said eh, $5 (the sale was $10 per box load of stuff.) Well, I got home tonight & put some batteries in it... IT WORKS!!!!! They said it didn't. Sweet! Nice find!

03-25-2023, 07:14 PM - 1 Like	#26125
pepperberry farm amateur dirt farmer Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: probably out in a field somewhere... Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 41,766	one Topcor Auto RE 5.8cm f1.4

03-26-2023, 09:25 AM	#26126
gatorguy Moderator Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Central Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,094	Originally posted by pepperberry farm one Topcor Auto RE 5.8cm f1.4 I had considered findign the 1.8 version, but I've not followed thru. Whether one is better than the other on FF depends on which one the reviewer chose, or have you now used both? Oh, and I have a new, still in the box and never opened, FA35 2.0 on the way for the K1 mono.

03-26-2023, 09:37 AM	#26127
pepperberry farm amateur dirt farmer Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: probably out in a field somewhere... Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 41,766	Originally posted by gatorguy I had considered findign the 1.8 version, but I've not followed thru. Whether one is better than the other on FF depends on which one the reviewer chose, or have you now used both? Oh, and I have a new, still in the box and never opened, FA35 2.0 on the way for the K1 mono. I have the later tribute lens, made by Cosina, but no other Topcons (yet) - I had to also buy an adapter so I can use the RE 5.8....

03-26-2023, 10:45 AM	#26128
tim60 Pentaxian Join Date: Apr 2011 Photos: Albums Posts: 8,756	Originally posted by WhatsMyNameAD67 Sweet! Nice find! Do you mean “near but oh so far”?

03-28-2023, 02:30 AM	#26130
richard0170 Site Supporter Join Date: Feb 2017 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,034	Originally posted by Digitalis Spotted a Nikon DF in the local camera shop today, it must be the first second hand one I have seen in YEARS...I have to say it is a very appealing camera. The price is very tempting. Make sure you get a good feel of it before you commit to buying. I got rid of mine after a few months, as I found it horrible to actually use, though I loved the IQ and it was ideal for MF Nikon glass.