Originally posted by savoche I am
not printing 200 images from the latest safari just to bore my family to death when a projector can to the job perfectly well
Edit: Sorry, didn't really read you post, did I
I bought a screen some years ago that was supposed to be good for use in not completely dark rooms. Have no idea what kind, but it works.
When all three screen types were available (they probably still are), some magazine tested and found: 1) you could sit farther to the side of a lenticular and still have an adequately bright image; 2) glass bead, no surprise, reflected the most light and was brightest, but the brightness fell off rapidly if you moved to the side; 3) matte, with neither the vertical ridge-&-grooves of a lenticular nor the texture of glass beads gave the best IQ, and maybe the best color fidelity, but the latter could also be influenced by the projector lamp, condensers and lens. I have found the problem of color-the-way-I-want-it is far worse for digital. Adjust the color of an image on my big desktop with its large, expensive monitor, then the image looks not-quite right: 1) on my laptop; 2) on our very large digital TV; 3) at camera club through a projector onto a huge wall-mounted screen. At least with chromes, what I saw using my Carousel & screen at home was pretty much identical to what was seen using the camera club's Carousel & screen, except the bigger screen tended to reveal dust specks I didn't notice at home. The latter is a problem now only with scans.