Originally posted by luftfluss Ditto. Do I really need
five 2.5+ Kg telephoto lenses?
I need a philosophy of why I own gear and a process to choose which gear fits that philosophy. Collecting is a legitimate part of philosophy, but using has to be a/the core element. If nothing makes a particular lens collectible then the best performing or most collectible lens should be kept and the others sold. Then one outright best performing lens beyond the collectibles is OK. No looking back!
For instance: I don’t need 40 normals. The 8-element SuperTak 50/1.4 is enough for m42. If I have the K variant of a FL, why do I need the Talkumar variant at all? If I have the A50/1.2, why do I need the 1.4? If I have the K55/1.8, why do I need the M50/1.7?. Add the CZ Ultron 1,8 50mm as the most collectible normal; the DA*50/1.4 and the FA43/1.9 lowest serial. Dispose of all the others.
For example: Why do I need every successive Asahi m37 and m42 body? Keep the AP and SV. Dispose of
all other m37 and m42 cameras
For example: Why do I need DA lenses at all?
For example: If I have the DFA*70200/2.8, why do I neeed the FA*200/2.8 (or the converse)?
Last edited by monochrome; 01-04-2020 at 09:38 AM.