Originally posted by jsherman999 .
My take, which is worth little, but...
I think it would be very sad if Gus's entire posting history is wiped out.
I'd guess *that* is neither practicable nor reasonable.
Nor, even, reflecting what Gus posted for in the first place.
Quote: Gus, I don't think you really want that either - in fact, after a couple months, I think you'll change your mind about that. You may never post here again, but it's nice for you and your friends to have your history intact, to see your images, to remember the forum from those days.
I doubt pressing him on this will have him come back, but then again, someone repeatedly storming off on the Internet '4Evar!!!'
...a lot....
Ill-befits someone who claims to be some kind of 'elder.'
Quote: Just take some time to cool down, go out and shoot, etc. Let's leave your history alone.
Guess would be, the TOS here don't involve removing all content on demand.
Quote: Also; Personally.... I think that if I owned the forum, I may have done a lot of the same things Adam has done lately. (with the exception of the
spam-for-cam contest
) The forum is a potential money earner, and there is nothing wrong with earning money off something - photography... or a photography forum. Especially when the intrusiveness of the changes is relatively minor.
While there's nothing wrong with earning money, changing up the game after advertising as not-about money, if that were to happen... Might not come off as cool.
Quote: So, Gus, stay, or take a break, even long one, but let us enjoy your posting history. When all the kids are shooting the Pentax FF camera and D-FA 135 Limited 5 years from now, we want them to be able to know who this "Gus" person was that all the old-timers refer to....
This may be overestimating the drama. A wee tad.
Gus has been a valued member of the forum, but he's not some diva that would make the forum fold even if he *did* retroactively disappear.
Actually, it looks more like he tried to throw more weight around than he *had* and feels backed into a corner.
Over *Cody* that he wouldn't give the time of day to, by the sound of it?
I say, screw that.
Gus? If you see this.
Some red plastic camera in the hands of someone you don't like is not worth all the time and effort you've spent here, which is not something you can take back, cause you already gave it as it was.
Yes, it's still valued, but whoever you think JCT 101 is, it is nothing he owns or took from you.
Or a thing you can ransom.
We're just a bunch of interesting folks thrown together by a common lens mount or three.
Other than that, it's the Mother-loving Internet.
So what?
Last we spoke, I was angry at you, and felt ill-used, myself, so, you know, go if you must, but don't think that if there's anything to take personally about this community, it doesn't mean stuff like this doesn't happen once in a while.
I'd greet you back in your time, and not think a thing of it.
Take it from an old punker:
Life's too long for grudges, and the Net's attention span is probably too short to care.
So.
All this. A lens mount.
I've seen sillier.
Diddly, you know? Come or go, Gus, and blessings either way.