Originally posted by theUg You don’t necessarily need to focus on oil so much. They had somebody on NPR talking about solar-to-steam technology ─ not photo-voltaic, but where sun heats up water, producing steam, which, in turn (no pun), spins conventional turbines. They said to power whole of U,S. You’d need only relatively small coverage of 67 square miles of solar receptors. What’s more, you can build those at conventional power-plants, thus cutting capital investments, it provides for smaller, distributed grid. All they said they need is to create climate where they can stand up and compete with big oil, big coal etc. All we need is political will to make that happen.
In the late 70s, when the second Arab Oil Embargo hit, I remember picking up a copy of Popular Science, with diagrams of these solar farms and similar statistics. By the 80s, all interest in these projects had waned. I think one was built in here as a test.
---------- Post added 05-11-2010 at 07:05 AM ----------
Originally posted by NaClH2O Rupert, you don't understand. We need this spill!
NaCl(hooray! hooray! Vice has saved the day!)H2O
This spill can do long term good only if every penny spent on it ends up in the price of oil. While other countries have made oil consumption within their borders more expensive, we keep subsidizing it--again on the government credit card.
Add the full cost of cleanup and regulation, and add the full cost of defending the supply to a barrel of oil, and the market will give us solar power generation and conservation. Put 100% of the cost of the automobile on to its price and/or the price of its fuel, and you will see fast, clean trains that people use and housing that is located in places that make sense.