Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!

lithos · 01-01-2008, 11:49 PM

Faker than Meg Ryan's orgasm.

little laker · 01-02-2008, 12:05 AM

She promised me that it was real

roentarre · 01-02-2008, 12:13 AM

Originally posted by little laker

She promised me that it was real

I need to see it to believe that

**David** · 01-02-2008, 01:40 AM

And to add insult to injury, there is no strap lug on the left hand side

If this was done by PS I would want my money back

RiceHigh · 01-02-2008, 06:31 AM

JMS · 01-02-2008, 08:09 AM

Why, RH, thanks for overloading my bandwidth with your massive fake picture. I really appreciate it a lot.

thibs · 01-02-2008, 08:12 AM

Originally posted by JMS

Why, RH, thanks for overloading my bandwidth with your massive fake picture. I really appreciate it a lot.

It is no real fake, it is the MZ-D prototype which never made it to production and was indeed named K1.

As RiceHigh still lives a couple years behind he maybe did not understand that there was no 35mm sensor for quite a time, if ever but oh well....

BrendanPK · 01-02-2008, 09:54 AM

Darn it people, I hate thoes who keep bringing up the old MZ-SD (now the K1) I loved that body and design and sooooo wanted and was expecting it to come out many moons ago. Yes Yes I know of all the problems but I still want the body. Of course with a few minor corrections like a vert. shutter release, updated AF/AFpoints and larger LCD but overall it was a nice body. and I still love my film MZ-S. ohh the humanity. thanks... camera depressed again...

little laker · 01-02-2008, 10:22 AM

Originally posted by roentarre

I need to see it to believe that

Just give me a day, and I promise that the picture will look better than the K1D

thibs · 01-02-2008, 10:55 AM

Originally posted by BrendanPK

Darn it people, I hate thoes who keep bringing up the old MZ-SD (now the K1) I loved that body and design and sooooo wanted and was expecting it to come out many moons ago. Yes Yes I know of all the problems but I still want the body. Of course with a few minor corrections like a vert. shutter release, updated AF/AFpoints and larger LCD but overall it was a nice body. and I still love my film MZ-S. ohh the humanity. thanks... camera depressed again...

And a wheel to control aperture otherwise, there'd be a big problem with those DA lenses

axl · 01-02-2008, 11:59 AM

Well, the first pic is poorly done clone job on K10D with grip IMO...
RH's pic is reall but see Thibs' post for explanation...
And as for Ben's opinion. Makes sense that when he didn't write agianst K200D pics they may be reall. If they are. We are just about to get another beauty from Pentax...

hll · 01-03-2008, 05:43 AM

i think it should have a 16-50 da* on it

Kaimarx · 01-03-2008, 10:45 AM

Originally posted by Kunzite

How many lens release buttons are in that picture? I count two, and two IR receivers for the remote

Because when your holding the camera on either grip youre blocking the IR reciever..duh. This way as you hold and look through the viewfinder with one hand the free hand can swing around and point the remote at the open reciever from the front to release the shutter....sheesh.

:lol

quarc · 01-03-2008, 01:50 PM

My first thought when I saw the picture was that it was a fake, but since everyone else thinks that maybe I should defend the the possibility. Maybe Pentax added those artefacts to the picture on purpose in case it would leak out so that people would THINK it was a fake? But I HOPE it is a fake, I don't like the design.

quarc · 01-03-2008, 01:53 PM

Originally posted by hll

i think it should have a 16-50 da* on it

I would prefer a DA* 29/1.2 :-)
But I agree it unlikley to promote a K1D with the 'old' 16-45.

01-02-2008, 06:31 AM	#20
RiceHigh Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 1,934	The Real One

01-03-2008, 10:45 AM	#28
Kaimarx Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Auckland Photos: Gallery Posts: 452	Originally posted by Kunzite How many lens release buttons are in that picture? I count two, and two IR receivers for the remote Because when your holding the camera on either grip youre blocking the IR reciever..duh. This way as you hold and look through the viewfinder with one hand the free hand can swing around and point the remote at the open reciever from the front to release the shutter....sheesh.:lol

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K1D	MJB DIGITAL	Pentax DSLR Discussion	28	03-04-2008 01:58 AM
More Rumors of a possible K1D	jbcampbell	Pentax News and Rumors	79	02-10-2008 09:00 PM
Pentax K20D, K5D, or K1D (or both a K5D and a K1D)?	stewart_photo	Pentax News and Rumors	42	01-04-2008 02:45 AM
K1D/K10Ds?	wmmk	Pentax DSLR Discussion	7	04-11-2007 08:34 PM
K1D rumours?	Harald	Pentax DSLR Discussion	3	02-02-2007 03:03 AM

01-01-2008, 11:49 PM	#16
lithos Inactive Account Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUS Posts: 3,261	Faker than Meg Ryan's orgasm.

01-02-2008, 12:05 AM	#17
little laker Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Photos: Gallery Posts: 5,697	She promised me that it was real

01-02-2008, 12:13 AM	#18
roentarre Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 11,783	Originally posted by little laker She promised me that it was real I need to see it to believe that

01-02-2008, 01:40 AM	#19
David Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia Photos: Albums Posts: 347	And to add insult to injury, there is no strap lug on the left hand side If this was done by PS I would want my money back

01-02-2008, 08:09 AM	#21
JMS Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 273	Why, RH, thanks for overloading my bandwidth with your massive fake picture. I really appreciate it a lot.

01-02-2008, 08:12 AM	#22
thibs Pentaxian Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Belgium Photos: Albums Posts: 7,001	Originally posted by JMS Why, RH, thanks for overloading my bandwidth with your massive fake picture. I really appreciate it a lot. It is no real fake, it is the MZ-D prototype which never made it to production and was indeed named K1. As RiceHigh still lives a couple years behind he maybe did not understand that there was no 35mm sensor for quite a time, if ever but oh well....

01-02-2008, 09:54 AM	#23
BrendanPK Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Maryland Photos: Gallery Posts: 735	Darn it people, I hate thoes who keep bringing up the old MZ-SD (now the K1) I loved that body and design and sooooo wanted and was expecting it to come out many moons ago. Yes Yes I know of all the problems but I still want the body. Of course with a few minor corrections like a vert. shutter release, updated AF/AFpoints and larger LCD but overall it was a nice body. and I still love my film MZ-S. ohh the humanity. thanks... camera depressed again...

01-02-2008, 10:22 AM	#24
little laker Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Photos: Gallery Posts: 5,697	Originally posted by roentarre I need to see it to believe that Just give me a day, and I promise that the picture will look better than the K1D

01-02-2008, 10:55 AM	#25
thibs Pentaxian Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Belgium Photos: Albums Posts: 7,001	Originally posted by BrendanPK Darn it people, I hate thoes who keep bringing up the old MZ-SD (now the K1) I loved that body and design and sooooo wanted and was expecting it to come out many moons ago. Yes Yes I know of all the problems but I still want the body. Of course with a few minor corrections like a vert. shutter release, updated AF/AFpoints and larger LCD but overall it was a nice body. and I still love my film MZ-S. ohh the humanity. thanks... camera depressed again... And a wheel to control aperture otherwise, there'd be a big problem with those DA lenses

01-02-2008, 11:59 AM	#26
axl Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Nove Zamky, Slovakia Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 7,183	Well, the first pic is poorly done clone job on K10D with grip IMO... RH's pic is reall but see Thibs' post for explanation... And as for Ben's opinion. Makes sense that when he didn't write agianst K200D pics they may be reall. If they are. We are just about to get another beauty from Pentax...

01-03-2008, 05:43 AM	#27
hll Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: new york Photos: Gallery Posts: 297	i think it should have a 16-50 da* on it

01-03-2008, 01:50 PM	#29
quarc Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Sweden Photos: Gallery Posts: 182	My first thought when I saw the picture was that it was a fake, but since everyone else thinks that maybe I should defend the the possibility. Maybe Pentax added those artefacts to the picture on purpose in case it would leak out so that people would THINK it was a fake? But I HOPE it is a fake, I don't like the design.

01-03-2008, 01:53 PM	#30
quarc Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Sweden Photos: Gallery Posts: 182	Originally posted by hll i think it should have a 16-50 da* on it I would prefer a DA* 29/1.2 :-) But I agree it unlikley to promote a K1D with the 'old' 16-45.

so its actually the k1d

Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!