I think everyone on both sides of the K-01 debate has backed off the tone in the last few weeks. While we still have our opinions, we seem to be making rational points and expressing our thoughts
as opinions rather than certainties. A few of us bought a K-01 (first time I've ever pre-ordered a camera; I am captivated by the design and I'm happy with the ergonomics and tolerant of the limitations) but most waited nervously - and now we have this potential Grand Slam home run K-30.
Is the K-01 a success? The thing we don't really know is what Pentax's objective was for the camera. If the objective was to stimulate a lot of notice for the brand in new circles and break even on the product line (or maybe even lose money but count that as marketing expense) then maybe it is a success.
I suspect the K-300 / K30 / K-3 / K-? 4-dSLR line is showing some back-to-Pentax true chops - compact, durable, WR, great IQ - and the Q, K-0
x series and 645D are the niche
different plays that generate buzz and technology development.
I'll be happy forever if that is Ricoh's plan! (Think about that last line for a moment
)