Thanks audiobomber.
I started this test to K20D users, who have not bought a new camera k-30, who can see pictures taken from old and new cameras.
I also wanted to show what the company Pentax has achieved for this four and a half years, when she has gone from K20D to K-30.
Originally posted by audiobomber The difference you see in file size is because the K20 is set for Premium quality jpegs, the K-30 is set for Best quality. That means the K-30 jpegs are slightly more compressed (contain less data) than the K20D images.
i.e. 14.6MP and 16.3MP respectively and one file JPEG of 10 Mb (K20D) and another 6.68 Mb (K-30) respectively.
i.e. the amount of information in this file in the new camera K-30 has decreased almost by half.
OK.
I'm not going to defend the thesis on a comparison of these two cameras, and I can stop the publication of comments, if someone is not interested.
However, I will say why I bought the K-30.
I know many pentaxians in waiting full frame camera. Me too. And K-30, I would use with a future zoom lens Pentax DA 18-85mm / 2.8. That is, in the usual for me pattern focal lengths in APS-C.
My Carl Zeiss lenses 18mm, 28mm, 50mm and 100mm I want used in a new full-frame Pentax camera.
It's dreams and goals.
But the reality you can see future reality in my pictures above.
Thanks one more.
Last edited by Mr. A.S.; 08-26-2012 at 11:49 AM.