Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Gothenburg, aka Göteborg |
Just a couple of thoughts:
Jatrax wrote:
[*]All brands have issues, so jumping to a different brand may or may not improve things
Indeed, indeed, but my worst experience was with Pentax, a couple of K-5s passed through my hands before I gave up, and the wife's DA*50-135 had SDM problems.
Most stupid problem was with an Olympus compact, that died the third day into a vacation in the US. Had to be sent to Olympus service center, in Switzerland, for a firmware update. Since then, it hasn't missed a shot (this was so long ago that you were not allowed to do firmware updates yourself).
[*]Pentax repair times have been poor, but it seems they are aware and are making changes. Whether that will be an improvement is unknown, yet.
Here Nikon has changed their routines when it comes to repairs, so they only do them themselves, thus delays and frustration!
[*]I have had k-x, k-5, two different k-5IIs, k-01 and k-3. The k-5 developed a mirror motor fault after about 40,000 images. No issues with any of the others.
My K-5 had all kinds of problems, from oil on the sensor, to dead card reader/writer. We, the wife and I, had two K-5s, and still have one K-30 and a K-x. Only my K-5 misbehaved.
Since I switched to mainly Nikon I've had dust/oil problems with my D600 (over 10,000 actuations as yet), that's all, while the K-30, and the K-x, are still in mint condition, after a few thousand actuations each.
We own five DSLR/MILC Nikons, all without any further issues, two Olympus, one Ricoh, one Canon, four Sony, and probably some more, that I've forgotten (never used). No real issues with any of them, none of them having needed service, beyond that mentioned above. A couple of batteries have died, or been replaced, free of charge, that's all.
[*]I shoot about 20,000 images per year and I would say based on that I am quite happy with service I have gotten from my Pentax gear.
We shoot quite a lot more than that, and have not had any problems with Pentax's repairs/replacement of cameras. A sad fact is that the K-3's problems with shutter flutter is well known, and not yet solved fully, as far as I'm aware.
[*]Image quality is quite similar across brands at this point and I think the determining factor should be how the camera feels and works in your hand. I have tried Canon and Nikon and they do not come close to fitting my hands as well as Pentax YMMV
Well, that is both true, and totally false, In good light, and low ISO, yes, then the differences are surprisingly small, but in more demanding situations the difference is huge!
I loved the Pentax K-5's menu system, and fast sensor, but didn't like the noise at base ISO, nor the problems I had with the rest (the K-x and the K-7 never had any isssues).
The 50-135 problem, we later learned, are well known (all lenses equipped with the SDM had/have reliability issues), and Pentax never ever did any SDM replacements for free. Our lens was used, but after repair it was never the same again. I would never trust a lens with SDM again, ever.
Nikon's DX cameras are not better than Pentax's, from an IQ point of view, nor features, but the lens selection is vast, and many of the really good lenses cheap, like the micro-NIKKOR 40/2.8. And most of these works just perfect on the Nikon 1 cameras, and on the full frames. So that's what I use: DX lenses on my Nikon 1 cameras, and on my FX, plus a couple of full frame lenses as well. We also have almost all the Nikon 1 lenses, and the F Mount adapter, cunningly called the FT1 adapter.
I love my small-ish Nikon 1 cameras, which has a crop factor of 2.7, thus a 70-300 becomes a 200-800 lens, with better DOF than a 'real' 200-800.
They have to be treated with respect in low light, so that's where my FX camera comes in. I have three DX cameras, one Pentax, one Ricoh, and one Sony. none of them will wear out, I'm afraid as they tend to get too little use (the Ricoh is new, so I can't say for sure about that, yet)!
|