Well, after toying around with RawTherapee for about a couple of years now & Adobe Lightroom for the past year, I've come to a final conclusion. RawTherapee is probably the best open-source RAW editing software out there. I have tried Darktable, the Silkypix bundled with the K-50, & a few other RAW processing programs & although they are great, I can't seem to get the most image detail out of them. RawTherapee does have a steep learning curve, but once you get the hang of it, it is quite awesome. However, Lightroom still seems to edge it out slightly.
After lots of trial & error, I have come to the conclusion that RawTherapee, Silkypix, & Darktable are great up to ISO 3200 for the K-50/K-30. They all handle the high ISO pictures a little differently with RawTherapee leading the pack as far as image detail goes & Darktable following very closely. However, starting at ISO 6400 it seems like they all struggle to produce an eye pleasing jpeg. The developed pictures seem to look very harsh, digitized, compressed, & have some artifacts going on. It's probably from the K-50/K-30 12 bit RAW files. They still offer more detail than the OOC jpeg, but they give up a lot of other things in different ways.
This is where Adobe Lightroom steps in. When you compare an ISO 6400 OOC jpeg, RawTherapee jpeg, Silkypix jpeg, Darktable jpeg, & Lightroom jpeg, the Lightroom jpeg has the most detail & least amount of artifacts. The picture looks way more natural as well. You can shoot up to ISO 12800 & still get some decent images out of the K-50/K-30 in Lightroom, whereas the rest of the pack is limited to about ISO 3200. The Lightroom jpegs still look better at ISO 3200. Even ISO 1600 jpegs look a tad bit better.
However, when you process lower ISO RAW files, Lightroom seems to make the noise grain look larger than what it actually is. It's not bad looking per se, but you do notice it. This is where RawTherapee seems to beat it a bit. The grain looks finer & smaller in the RawTherapee images. You do get more noise overall when you process the photos in general, but you recover a lot more detail out of the pics. RawTherapee gives a very fine grain up to ISO 3200 & Lightroom up to 12800.
For those of you that print large pictures, here's an idea of what you can do with a non-cropped, properly exposed & focused TIFF image processed in RawTherapee. These are the absolute maximum print sizes with a minimum of a little more than 100 DPI & you are looking at the printed image from an arm's length or at a reasonable viewing distance.
ISO 100 to 200 = 30x45
ISO 400 to 800 = 24x36 (with minimal color noise reduction for ISO 800)
ISO 1600 = 20x30 (with minimal color noise reduction)
ISO 3200 = 16x24 (with minimal color noise reduction)
ISO 6400 = 11x17 (with minimal color noise reduction & luminance noise reduction)
If you want to push large high ISO prints to their limits, a TIFF from Lightroom is the only way to go.
ISO 100 to 800 = same as RawTherapee
ISO 1600 = 24x36 (with minimal color noise reduction)
ISO 3200 = 20x30 (with minimal color noise reduction)
ISO 6400 = 16x24 (with minimal color & luminance noise reduction)
ISO 12800 = 11x17 (with minimal color & luminance noise reduction)
Obviously the prints will get smaller if you crop them. That goes to show how much you can pull out of the 12 bit RAW file that is coming out of the K-50/K-30 sensor. The K-50/K-30 OOC jpegs show a little less detail & the higher ISO jpegs start to lose a ton of detail at ISO 800, making the print sizes even smaller. The K-5 series would yield similar results, but with slightly larger high ISO prints from their 14 bit RAW files. I'm going to guess that one could get a 24x36 print out of an ISO 3200 K-5 RAW file.
I do a lot of low light high ISO shooting with my K-50 & have noticed that I've been using Lightroom a bit more. I get larger high ISO prints out of it, but I still like toying with RawTherapee & try to mimic Lightroom's RAW processing capabilities with it, but I still can't match Lightroom's ISO 1600 to 6400 results & ISO 12800 is useless in RawTherapee. You can't beat free, though.
So it boils down to this. I still think RawTherapee is the best free RAW processing program out there, followed by Darktable. I am referring only to the RAW processing ability. Darktable has a ton of other features similar to Adobe Lightroom, but it's for Linux only. The cool thing about RawTherapee is that you can use it on Windows, Linux, Mac, & other operating systems & they all function the same way which makes it great for people that use multiple operating systems. On the other hand, Adobe Lightroom is limited to Windows only & you have to pay $10 (USD) a month for it, but you can squeeze a bit more high ISO images out of the K-50/K-30 sensor with it. I guess you get what you pay for.
So are any of you still using RawTherapee or are you using something else? Got any tips & junk for RawTherapee? Let us know!