Originally posted by umuttepe So just because it is my first post, it become uncredible?
No, it's not about quantity, but quality!
Nevertheless: If you first post is based solely on unverified statements and basically has the central message of
"NO"... you are all wrong but I am Mr. Right.... then you need to "deliver". You have to deliver facts and not just statements!
Period.
Originally posted by umuttepe It is misleading to call my statements somewhat false. 1000 forum replies does not make you a expert..
And one single statement based on zero evidence is basicallly "hot air".
Originally posted by umuttepe I've tested DAL and a sigma 18-35.
Well, those are just two lenses plus an M lense. So this is not much evidence.
Originally posted by umuttepe The problems are the same as many people discuss in this and many other forums.
Yes and now comes Mr. Superright and knows best but can't deliver any facts
Originally posted by umuttepe You guys try to be enginnering experts and figure out the problem, but it does not work out too good.
Strawman argument
Originally posted by umuttepe Every company tries to make as much money as they can, not only through sales. Repairs is also a important part in making money. Every company knowingly leaves some faults. For example: Renaults always have problems with leaking coolers..
So lets start a Renault cool threat instead.
Again: Strawman fallacy
Originally posted by umuttepe The aperture failure is not a mechanical problem, since the engine has no problem with pushing back on heavier levers. It is clearly a software problem.
Repetion of zero remains zero.
Even if you trumpet it in all TV shows: It will not become true!
So deliver! Facts! Prove!