Originally posted by dnas Well, the reason I say Micro 4/3 rather than mirrorless APS-C, is that Pentax then doesn't need to develop (with associated R&D costs) a completely new mount system like Sony and Samsung did.
And I don't think Sony and Samsung have "beaten Pentax to the punch" just yet, because for the moment, unlike micro 4/3, neither of those have established any real user base. And that would make THREE competing and incompatible APS-C mirrorless camera formats.
In my opinion, if Pentax establishes another new incompatible APS-C mirrorless camera format, that segment would be further fragmented.
Micro 4/3 is NOT a small market compared to APS-C dslr. Currently in Japan, more than 20% of ALL interchangeable lens camera sales are Micro 4/3.
Sony has LESS DSLR sales than this. And Nikon has only a 5-7% lead over Micro 4/3.
I'm not saying Pentax WILL adopt micro 4/3. I'm just saying that from a sales point of view, without excessive R&D cost, a Pentax line up including micro 4/3 would work BETTER than developiing its own incompatible APS-C mirrorless camera format.
M43 has royalties for the standard, and patents, not all of which are part of the "open" standard. Pentax would have to charge more than Panasonic or Olympus to pay them their dues.
The only advantage to M43 is the ability to swap lenses amongst brands, but because so many lenses use proprietary algorithms for distortion correction, this is more a marketing concept than a functional system tool. Use an Oly lens on a Panasonic camera is nonsense if the Panasonic cannot use the lens as fully as it could a genuine Panasonic lens thanks to the software.
The M43 system is proprietary and it uses a smaller sensor with poor IQ ratings compared to APS-C. If anything Pentax will do an EVIL APS-C system, an APS-C system as we know it, and an MF system (645D). If they can get their lens line-up right, perhaps a single FF unit as well, but not for awhile. If Pentax drops to a sensor size below APS-C and a new mount, they will lose a big chunk of their current 5% market share because they will not have enough resources to take care of their current APS-C base, which is 95% of their sales. All those DA Limited lenses which define the brand need somewhere to live for the next decade+ or Pentaxians will leave to another system, not M43.
I see Pentax 2010-2011with:
1) APS-C EVIL
2) APS-C (K-x+)
3) APS-C (K-7+)
4) 645D
I have long said that Pentax very much needs a 3-body marketing strategy. They have a very large gap between the 2 DSLR models right now both in features and price point. A lot of the issues around EVIL will be cost, as it is likely the EVIL will initially cost more than the K-x slot, but be less functional.
At some point the K-7 slot will become FF. There will long be a market for an APS-C main body, non-EVIL. Right now the big brands are keeping FF high-margin. No price wars. This is the $$$ stream, not to be messed with.
It's also very telling that Canikon have not jumped into the EVIL or M43 race as of yet. That will happen this Fall, but Canon's marketing arm generally shoots its arrows straight, so I trust their knowledge of the consumer base more than a single uptick in one country in one sector's unit sales. Reviews of M43 have not exactly been favourable, so this trend may not have legs.
All this for 25mm of flange distance. Really! And you STILL cannot put one of these M43 cams in a pocket.