Originally posted by emr Well, that's a good question. 1mm?
I'd say at 16mm, the difference between 2.8 and 4 isn't big enough to be a deal maker... 12-24, 16-45, 16/17-50 lenses that we already have is a way more useful range on crop. IIRC in Canonland the 16-35/2.8 isnt as popular as the 17-55/2.8 or 17-40/4 that they have as alternatives for APS-C users. APS-H users might find some use for this lens though.
This lens might attract film users if it has an aperture ring though (or even if it doesn't, you can still use it with bodies that can control aperture). Hopefully Pentax did collaborate on this and that it's a signal of the FF model to come