Originally posted by civiletti Compared to the K-20, there was more emphasis on video with the K-7. What, you say the K-20 did not have HD video? My point, exactly.
Look, for many users the K-7 is a great camera. For someone interested in high detail, high dynamic range landscapes, it does not provide significant improvement over its predecessors. HDR is not useful in all situations. A high native dynamic range sensor is.
Well, of course
I just disagree with the assertion that a lot of focus went into video. Any videographer knows after a few minutes with the camera that this wasn't the case. Still, K-7 video is useful if you're willing to work around the kinks.
FWIW, I agree with your second paragraph. I would never think of doing HDR in-camera; much less if it can't be done hand-held. I for one am in the "faster AF-C, better low-light" boat. At least they gave us (much) improved flash exposures, a little better AF-S, much quieter shutter action and more FPS (as long as you don't use AF).
For the next cam I'd want good movies, great AF, an even bigger finder (with higher eyepoint!), better low-light/high ISO RAWs (and JPEGs for the reviewers), better DR in the lights, swiveling screen and better battery management.
Originally posted by zackspeed No more Samsungsensor.New Line has one actually and a complete new Sensor.
I think this is a false friend. In german, "aktuell" means "current, new, up to date", which I think is what he means. Which, of course, is kind of a given on a new camera anyway.