Originally posted by andi If Pentax dies is because of the bad marketing, not lack of FF...
so true, I really hope pentax is listening to us
because the WR in the k7 kills the 7d/d300, people need to know this. I've seen videos of k7's being used in the shower, because I searched for it on youtube, people who would otherwise buy a 7d need to see this video at the point of sale to sway them to pentax
SR works incredibly well for video work, again there seems to be no marketing push towards filmmakers to say that pentax M glass with in body SR is a cheap and high quality way to get great footage (although I guess the lack of marketing is because there isn't a pentax camera with great video yet). There needs to be a video showing a kx and a 50mm 1.7 stabilised, showing how much of an effect the IS has, and how much better value for money the pentax system is
AF improvements and FF are valuable, but indie filmmakers is a huge market and it's only going to increase as video becomes the standard. There's a really interesting interview with vincent la foret where he says that the shift in journalism from print to digital will mean that video is more important than stills, this will become common place, to not embrace this will mean you are left behind.
A FF, in body IS pentax camera with better AF and video AF (although not essential)would destroy the 5d, assuming the pentax has all the features required (HDMI out etc).
IMO they have to leapfrog canon. Canon are already there with the 5,7 and even the 550- so far pentax doesn't have 1 camera which competes, until the 550d I would have heartily recommended the kx as it was seriously a better camera than the 500d, but the 550 changed my mind. Nikon look like they might be onto a winner with the 3100 and the d800/d700s will be a 5d killer. Pentax need to do something about this