Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 1 Like Search this Thread
09-07-2010, 10:17 PM   #46
ogl
Banned




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sankt Peterburg
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,382
It will be funny if K-r and K-5 have new Samsung sensors.

09-07-2010, 10:24 PM   #47
Nubi
Guest




QuoteOriginally posted by Asahiflex Quote
I like the colors of the K-7 more than those from the K-x.

Wait, I thought that K-x was the camera with many colors.

Just kidding. I have been practicing taking quotes out of context. It is fun.


But I wholeheartely agree. You are one of the very few who holds that view here, and thank you for sharing. However, there will then be dumb asses who will be asking if you can really distinguish pictures taken by these two cameras on uncalibrated monitors. Those mortals . . . .
09-08-2010, 12:23 AM   #48
Ash
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,920
QuoteOriginally posted by garyk Quote
Only thing I would like is the k-x sensor in the k-7 body. Reading this Pentax has already shot themselfs in the foot with the k-7. Now all will be very careful before buying the next Pentax.
Another thing i do not understand is the lens line up. Isn't Hoya a premier glass and optics designer.
Pentax just isn't giving me that warm and fuzzy feeling. I am kinda worried.

Too bad for them. Just bad business.
Sure, Gary - you and some others would like the decent K-x sensor in the K-7 successor, but as has been discussed, there needs to be more pushing of the envelope if Pentax's flagship model is to compare and compete with the rival companies, making new buyers go for Pentax over the other brands for good reasons. The sensor is the heart of the camera, and has to perform. 12Mp is simply not the way forward for Pentax in the K-5. I'm certainly not advocating a pixel competition, but with 14Mp being offered in the last 2 flagship models, going backward in the next model is a definite backward move. I'd personally be disappointed - and it wouldn't be right to fit it in the K-r either...

Now the K-7 was definitely no failure either, regardless of the sentiment expressed here by a few - it actually put Pentax on the map internationally. People's heads were turning towards the K-7, then when the K-x came out, it too became a hit internationally. Things are looking up for Pentax, but yes, the momentum does need to build up for the success to continue, so I'm hopeful that in just over 24 hours this will indeed be the case...
09-08-2010, 01:12 AM   #49
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,689
The armchair experts of this forum are hard at work again.

09-08-2010, 01:25 AM   #50
Veteran Member
JohnBee's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newrfoundland
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,667
QuoteOriginally posted by Christopher M.W.T Quote
The armchair experts of this forum are hard at work again.
laughed so hard, my arms almost lifted off their rests.
09-08-2010, 01:44 AM   #51
Junior Member




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 27
Yeah, the bashed, crappy Samsung sensor... I really pray for updated Samsung sensor... with lower dark noise at ISO1600-3200. I even bought another GX20 body, you know...because of it's wonderful performance at low ISO. Look at this comparison at ISO100. I don't want to denoise photos made at ISO100
Attached Images
 
09-08-2010, 02:03 AM   #52
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 527

oh yes.......the samsung in the k-7 is one of the best for low iso,but nobody will know that.
and till 2000asa itīs no problem to work with the k-7,nobody will know this.
but samsung is history now...

09-08-2010, 02:20 AM   #53
Senior Member
rhermans's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Europe - Belgium - Antwerp
Photos: Albums
Posts: 213
Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm still curious about the effects of the 1/3 light loss. If the camera acts like it is using an iso100 the sensor must be doing an extra effort to get there, what would mean that it is going at iso166.
So at 12.8K ISO it is really pushing the limit at 19.2K ISO what is simply stunning.
We won't know what the k5 will do, or even if it's the same sensor but I'm getting pretty interrested.
09-08-2010, 02:26 AM   #54
ogl
Banned




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sankt Peterburg
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,382
QuoteOriginally posted by Christopher M.W.T Quote
The armchair experts of this forum are hard at work again.
+100
09-08-2010, 02:27 AM   #55
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 527
QuoteOriginally posted by rhermans Quote
Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm still curious about the effects of the 1/3 light loss. If the camera acts like it is using an iso100 the sensor must be doing an extra effort to get there, what would mean that it is going at iso166.
So at 12.8K ISO it is really pushing the limit at 19.2K ISO what is simply stunning.
We won't know what the k5 will do, or even if it's the same sensor but I'm getting pretty interrested.
thatīs right
09-08-2010, 02:32 AM   #56
Forum Member
alessandro63's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 57
What is happening to the black lines in the hours indicators of that watch???
QuoteOriginally posted by BRunner Quote
Yeah, the bashed, crappy Samsung sensor... I really pray for updated Samsung sensor... with lower dark noise at ISO1600-3200. I even bought another GX20 body, you know...because of it's wonderful performance at low ISO. Look at this comparison at ISO100. I don't want to denoise photos made at ISO100
09-08-2010, 02:33 AM   #57
Veteran Member
JohnBee's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newrfoundland
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,667
QuoteOriginally posted by alessandro63 Quote
What is happening to the black lines in the hours indicators of that watch???
That's just the effects of noise
09-08-2010, 02:35 AM   #58
Forum Member
alessandro63's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 57
It would be extremely funny if we find a kodak or a fuji sensor inside.
QuoteOriginally posted by ogl Quote
It will be funny if K-r and K-5 have new Samsung sensors.
09-08-2010, 02:42 AM   #59
Veteran Member
JohnBee's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newrfoundland
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,667
QuoteOriginally posted by alessandro63 Quote
It would be extremely funny if we find a kodak or a fuji sensor inside.
The Fuji zealots would roll over in their graves!

I still have a soft spot for the S5 Pro btw.
09-08-2010, 02:46 AM   #60
Forum Member
alessandro63's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 57
jokes apart, is it a different watch, or something I don't know is happening?
I mean the missing horizontal black line in the 9 hour spot in the Sony and Canon image. Abrupt ghosting removal???
QuoteOriginally posted by JohnBee Quote
That's just the effects of noise
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
canon, k-r, noise, pentax news, pentax rumors, photography, range, review, sensor, sister, slt-a55, sony

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can sensors go bad? J Merrill Pentax DSLR Discussion 23 06-08-2010 10:40 PM
Favorable Review @ Alpha Mount World Compared with Sony A700 hans4 Pentax DSLR Discussion 5 04-11-2010 07:17 AM
Pentax Sensors scottax1 Pentax DSLR Discussion 2 04-07-2010 01:01 AM
Will Pentax go back to Sony sensors for the nextgen? virgilr Pentax DSLR Discussion 0 10-21-2009 06:49 AM
For Sale - Sold: Sony DSLR-A100, Sony 18-70, Tamron XR 28-200, Crumpler 3MDH inneyeseakay Sold Items 12 01-30-2009 05:47 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:13 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top