Originally posted by Miserere Or those who have been asking for a DA 28mm f/2 for the past few years
...
Take your pick, lol. And I understand the criticism. I am currently also a little underwhelmed. However, I guess I'm not as disappointed as some because:
1. I'm already satisfied with what I have in at this focal length.
2. And because I know two different Pentax users in my family alone who would consider spending more than $200 on a lens an exorbitant, unjustifiable amount of money while they would also like a autofocus lens wider than 50 mm. If you say "f/2.4 that's barely faster than a good f/2.8 zoom" you're already not looking at things from the right perspective. People who buy this new 35 mm will likely never own a f/2.8 zoom.
3. If it's the same design as the FA35 it will have great sharpness even wide open. And if that's true the f/1.8 difference from the Sony and Nikon counterparts, while it will look worse, won't really be that bad. Do many people use those lenses wide open with fantastic results?
Where Pentax may have made their mistake is by thinking that making the lens small and cheap was necessarily more important than making it as good as it could be. Small is something people notice after they buy the lens, but when they're buying online what they look at is the specs.