Unless you're a pro shooting high level action etc you're not likely to need a camera that costs $1500-5000. A $1300-1600 DSLR is getting pretty pricey even for serious hobbyists. I'm not saying some people won't run out and get one, but in my mind there's often a real question as to whether or not they actually need and can properly use a camera that does all that.
I met a guy last night who has a $1400 Canon DSLR. In over a year since he's purchased it the guy apparently has yet to read the darned manual let alone update his firmware. He's totally messing up what look to be great pics given the right settings because he can't figure out the menus well enough to correct his white balance, et all for the circumstances he's shooting in. (He can't correct after in software either, clueless, definitely not a Photoshop Guru, this guy.) He has some basic understanding of aperture, I'll give him that, but otherwise he'd be better off selling it and using a pocket camera for all the good his $1400 DSLR is doing him.
Fact is he has the eye of a decent photographer. If he'd just sit down and read the manual, learn the camera, he'd probably do all right. Fantastic, if he'd learn some basic moves in editing software. But he says he's "too busy" to read and fiddle with all that, and yet, he insists upon using the camera in manual mode.
30 minutes with the guy and in my head I was ready to deck him, grab his camera and run, I swear. People like him drive me crazy. He has to have the best "toys" but actually learning to USE them? That's far too much effort apparently.
I don't get people who have decent cameras, computers, phones etc who upgrade nearly every time a new one comes out. Just because they can. I only upgrade because I really need to for purposes of work mostly. If I happen to have already a 5 year old computer that still functions and that does the job just fine and can run what I need to do my job sans fuss? Then why buy another one till it can't?
Ditto new cars. People who go out and buy a new car every other year? I just don't get that. I've never owned a car that was new actually, always buy used by a few years, saves $$$, but I only sell one when it's practically too far gone to keep on putting repair money into it.
I have no doubt that when I can finally afford my "work" DSLR's that I'll be using both of them until they just give up on me. I'm going to buy the best cameras I can afford that will do the job, sure, but you won't see me swapping them out every two years if they are still working fine.
My Fuji has actually been with me since late 2002. It's just now getting to the point where I can tell it's probably on it's last legs. It's been bit a bit limiting that camera, but it was a good camera for a point and shoot, it's paid for itself many times over now. I will miss it when it's finally gone even if I have upgraded to a DSLR by then.
The goal of the retail industry is to keep people motivated to buy. I think it's far too easy sometimes to get trapped into a mindset of doing just that. I used to be that way about my other hobby. The new toys would come out every year and I'd plan and save with the goal of getting new ones every year whether I really needed them or not. Even in years where the offerings were only so-so I'd find myself still spending money on new stuff just because everybody else in my groups online was.
I don't do that anymore. I had to quit that crap for the sake of my wallet. I don't think I have to "keep up with the Joneses" anymore. I've finally come to realize that I just can't afford to be like that anymore. I always admire it when people want to show off their new toys, but I try to pull myself back from getting too interested.
The way I see it my goal is to look at what I'd like to buy, see what my actual requirements are for said type of item, then buy the least expensive item I can that will do most of what I want if not all. Preferably I want to buy used, but if I can buy new and not spend much more, maybe get a warranty, I usually will.
Over the years I've found doing that actually saves me a lot of grief. It's all too easy to get into the specs, to get so impressed that you end up spending far too much $$$ on something you really won't be using to full capacity. If you can, fine, but to buy when you may not need to, to buy far more that way than you actually need specs-wise and to break the bank doing it just doesn't make much sense to me.
I really like the K-x/K-7, but the only reason I'd likely not buy a used Pentax that's a couple of generations back is because the people who sell them used apparently seem to think that they can get me to pay practically the same $$$ for an older, used one as I can spend on a new model. Way I see it I'm just not going to spend $500 on a 5 year old Pentax DSLR when I can buy a K-x for the same or only a bit more than that.
Personally I think most of the stores online that sell used cameras are a bit nuts. I mean who in their right mind would buy a 5 year old DSLR for the same price as the similar new model on the shelf? Unless that older camera is really something special that's not very sensible.
PS: Rupert that's just beautiful.
Originally posted by Rupert 1/15 Hand held with Pentax SR.........I don't leave home without it! [/url] [/IMG]