Originally posted by falconeye I uploaded an image in full size, developped from a RAW file.
ISO 6400, DNG developped in LR2 with all settings default (which includes a mild treatment of brightness, contrast, 25% radius 1 sharpening and almost unnoticeable 25% color noise reduction). Color temperature is 2900K.
Click the image to see it full size.
Note that the image wasn't scaled to the lower resolution of a K-7 or K-x and therefore, noise isn't comparable 1:1. There is some color noise which means it doesn't beat physics
There is a second version of the image with different LR settings in the gallery after you click the image.
DISCLAIMER: This is from firmware version 0.30 and from a prototype camera. Don't draw final conclusions from this sample. However, changes in the firmware make RAW files differ less in final versions than JPEG files.
ummmmm....Faaaaalk...thanks for the shot, that is nice ISO6400 but that is not what caught my attention. What got me is, there is GPS data in the file. I thought I read there was no GPS function in the K5? So did you enter that info? Or did I go blind at just the wrong time or perhaps selectively and miss there is indeed a GPS function on the K5? Now that would be truly sexy for those who wander far and wide...or across the street for that matter. Then again for us at home it basically would give the location of my spare bedroom, errr, "office".
I am still cranky over the tethering thing as I can't keep more than one body and genuinely need slightly more multi-purpose from my gear so I can pay for more gear.
And again, just super effort getting us all this information. I really appreciate the feedback from such an impartial source.