Originally posted by brecklundin I think that is the point a lot of us here in the US are trying to make about the K5 pricing...it is, in fact NOT competitive with other options. Still if the firmware does improve things it might, and only might become competitive with the 7D but never will it be quite there due to the AF tracking and accuracy. Depending on the individual that may or may not matter.
And of course there is the D7000 for $400 less...price them about the same and the K-5 is probably the better camera. Buy jumping to the $1600 price point, Hoya is saying the K-5 is a level above the D7000 and on par with the 7D which, well, remains to be seen under real use but to the photographic community in general that is going to be a very hard sell.
Only time will tell and I have time to wait.
In many markets outside of the US, the K-5 is priced head to head with the D7000.
Still too early to make solid comparisons, but just for me, Image Quality is No.1 because the camera is basically an imaging device.
The humble K-X already matches the 7D in IQ - Dynamic Range and High-ISO performance. I won't be surprised at all if the K-5 easily surpasses the 7D.
For others, perhaps Tethering is a deal breaker ? Sorry, I don't think we'll see that from Pentax, not from this generation anyway. Pentax/Hoya just isn't focused on the serious studio user.
No tethering, wireless flash and multiple flash control are just not competitive with Canon/Nikon.
Pentax has a new AF system, we'll see how much better is the improvement.
"never will it be quite there due to the AF tracking and accuracy." may not be quite the case any more.
I don't expect the K-5 to ever sell anywhere near the volumes of the D7000 and the 7D. But that's more the outcome of the brand name recognition of Nikon/Canon and the sheer power of their distribution system.
Even my neighbourhood camera store (not one of the big city outlets) carries Nikon and Canon dSLRs. They've never heard of Pentax.