Originally posted by Kunzite For me, the K-5 is a much better choice than 7D. And even if it gets beaten in AF-C (?), I'm quite sure the Canon cannot match it's image quality.
And no, a K200D with a kit lens is not the best Pentax can do
Quite sure?! Check the IR Comparometer shots, and you'll see that not only can the EOS 7D
match the K5 image quality, it actually is BETTER at ISO 100 through 800, and still holds a slight edge at ISO 1600 (check the red leaves on red fabric, and you'll see the K5 is already mush at ISO 800, the EOS 7D still holds some detail; the bottle cap just below looks mushy on the K5 too, all the way down to ISO 100, compared with the EOS 7D shots). At ISO 1600+, they're both pretty awful, but I certainly wouldn't give the K5 an image quality edge...I'd say the EOS 7d holds a clear edge all the way from ISO 100 to ISO 800. Anything above ISO 800 looks pretty awful on either (too much detail smearing noise reduction), so who cares. Hell, an EOS 40D looks better at ISO 1600 than EITHER the K5 OR the EOS 7D - lol. More pixels on less-than-half-frame sensors isn't getting you anything but bigger files to store at this point.