Originally posted by noahpurdy The article is link-bait. Worthless fodder.
I have no affiliation with the site/author/any other ties. I don't think that's what you meant by you statement, but just wanted to be clear.
I simply stumbled across it when searching for K-5 reviews.
Originally posted by falconeye I was angry that I clicked the link and wanted others to save their time.
The thread title suggests content where there is none. The OP should have picked another title (feature comparison rather than "article") or at least warned in his post.
I didn't post it so that people could learn something new about these cameras - I think the very nature of this site (pentaxforums.com) means that most people reading this are already pretty clued up on the K-5.
I posted it because I thought it highlighted two contradictory points:
1) It's good the K-5 is getting some mainstrem attention
2) It's unfortunate that some people will probably use articles like this (with factually inaccurate information) to at least influence their purchasing decisions
I'm sorry the 'feature comparison' didn't include any schematics, formulas or graphs for you
Adam
Last edited by adamfogerty; 11-09-2010 at 10:07 AM.
Reason: I can't spell.