Originally posted by Branimir The problem with "where will Pentax be when time for upgrade comes" will be arising every time some other brand pulls another new toy from a hat and Pentax does not respond within weeks. Every time some people will herald doomsday for Pentax, and others will insatiably gulp rumors to make them sure that "they've made the right choice".
But the thing is, we aren't suddenly and irrationally reacting to Pentax being a couple of weeks late in responding to the another company's latest toy... no, many of us are responding to Pentax being several
years behind
all the competition in terms of lens choice (i.e. virtually no long glass at all), and also a little bit cautious about camera bodies because for years now Pentax have basically re-released the same camera (*Ist DS/DL/DS2/DL2/K100D/K110D/K100d-Super) with some minor improvements... the K10d was the only real exception, and it was very encouraging... until the company went completely silent, and was pretty late delivering their two higher-end zooms (which after all that wait frankly should be having better reviews and less reported problems)... as for why people would predict a "doomsday"... let's not forget that they were eaten up by another company, who were not exactly forthcoming with announcements promising their dedication to keeping and improving Pentax camera division. So to my mind there are plenty of good reasons for the worries and complaints; we're not just looking at a new Canikon and thinking "Oh no, Pentax doesn't make one like that!"
Originally posted by JamesD Well... I don't live on rumors. Hence, I just purchased two k10d cameras (one for my wife and one for me) along with some lenses and accessories. If this happens to be the last camera Pentax produces, so what. I'm sure we will enjoy many years of picture making with our cameras and have opportunities through third party lens makers to add to the system. I researched my purchase carefully for months. I purposely chose Pentax over Nikon and Canon (having had both of those brands in the past along with Minolta and we all know what happened to that venerable company).
Then again, I'm not one of those who stands in line at the check-out of our local supermarket and becomes enthralled by the latest rumors relating to the lives of Hollywood's so-called stars. I find rumor mills silly and mundane.
I'm glad you're confident that it would not inconvenience you if Pentax were to disappear... though personally I wouldn't be so sure about third-parties continuing to make lenses for Pentax in that situation, considering that they can't be bothered to make their best glass for Pentax even now.
I don't stand in line at the check-out reading celebrity magazines with dumb one-syllable titles either... I couldn't care less about who is doing what with whom... but this is really not comparable to worrying about camera systems. I haven't invested lots of money in Angelina Jolie, nor do I have a cupboard full of Lindsey Lohan which I won't be able to sell if she goes out of business.
I totally agree with your last sentence though... rumour mills are very silly... what I would like to see are
announcements... and ok fine, let's say Pentax have a camera so spectacular that they have to keep it secret... I still haven't heard a remotely convincing argument for why they can't at least tell us about the new lenses.
Originally posted by Ray Pulley At the end of the day if, as you say, the CaNikon lineup is more availble, or better or whatever, why do folks like you not own that system instead of Pentax? I suspect that there is one main reason, and that is simply the cost differential of owning CaNikon over Pentax.
So, given that, what everyone seems to want is everything CaNikon has, but they do not want to pay for it....
After all, if this is not true, those complaining would have just bellied up to the bar and put their money down for a CaNikon system, no?
Ray
Not at all... I don't want what Canon has (crappy entry-level stuff, cameras lacking in features and seemingly only designed for people with 20/20 vision who don't mind peering down tiny dark viewfinders, and terrible service in my experience)... nor do I want Nikon (overpriced gear with underwhelming features because they can afford to be complacent)... what I want is Pentax. The Pentax who produced the A and FA range of lenses. The Pentax who produced the LX, the MZ-S and yes the K10d. Not the Pentax who lazily knock out a "Super" version of the same camera they've been re-releasing for years... I don't want Canon and Nikon, I want Pentax to follow up their impressive achievement with the K10d by continuing to improve and expand the system (which means both lenses and bodies). I am one of those folks complaining... and no, I don't want a CaNikon system... I want a Pentax system, but proper Pentax.
Originally posted by benjikan I owned the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 when I was sponsored by Canon. One of the best lenses Sigma manufactures. Onpar with the best out there. Great choice.
Absolutely... a fantastic lens. And not even slightly available for Pentax any more. Ditto other high-end Sigma and Tamron lenses which they don't make for K-mount... maybe they might if they were a bit more confident in the system or had any idea what Pentax are planning to do with SDM?
Finally, thankyou Ben, Marc, Chris, and everyone else who seems to be in the know... you have told us all you can... I just think it is a real shame that you had to do so, and be met by doubts and barrages of questions... none of this would be necessary if Pentoya weren't doing such a good impression of a clam (a clam pretending to be dead even).