Originally posted by Christine Tham I can definitely confirm this. The camera is able to focus on a weak LED light (first photo), but misfocuses on a relatively strong yellow light, as you can see from my second photo.
[...]
What do you think of the theory proposed by dlacouture that the behaviour of the AF assist light may also be lens dependent?
Originally posted by Class A So do you think that scenario [(led vs. tungsten, ed.)] isn't covered by the three lightbulbs you used?
Should we not see bright (x-axis) red dots with high defocus and dim blue dots with low defocus in your graph then? As you say, I think Fig. 4 (and others) seem to provide evidence to the contrary.
Actually, if you look at
Fig.4, then you'll see that blue and magenta focusses correctly down to -1 EV while red "jumps" at 0 EV. Additionally, the way I measure LV weights red with 30% making it appear -1.7EV darker than a light meter's reading which must avoid channel clipping. Combined, this would give a, say 2.5 EV advantage to an LED light, compared to a tungsten light, based on automatic exposure readings.
Therefore, I think the study, Christine's observations and Class A's reasoning are all compatible statements.
The only thing I am less sure about is halogen. I've seen enough anecdotical evidence that halogen may be a special case. On the other hand, halogen spectrum is not special and I would have a hard time to understand why. So, for the time being, I classify the halogen case as mythical.
@Christine: Your spherical aberration theory is good. But I fear that we have some evidence against it like the dependency on light color or that stopping down doesn't help (beyond a proportional reduction of the confusion circle of course). Maybe, an extension of your theory to include CA or Bokeh-CA would be required. It still wouldn't explain the strong dependency on luminosity though.
We can all speculate (and I did it as well). But at the end of the day, we don't know what makes the lens dependency. That would require a very elaborate study in itself. BTW, I agree that the AF assist light behaviour could be lens dependent too.
Originally posted by HawaiianOnline 2) Does the 645D show this behavior as well since it (presumably) shares the same focusing system?
I would be rather surprised to learn that 645D and K-5 share the very same physical module. It would cover maybe less than the inner third of the 645D frame only.