Originally posted by dlacouture Okay, I've found another interesting fact about the K5's AF: the front-focus problem is indeed target-dependent...
I've made some focusing tests (light is the same power and distance in both cases):
- black rod in front of a white wall : camera metered the scene at 2.8EV, focus is good.
- white rod alone with dark empty space around : metered at 1.4EV, severe front-focus.
This is quite strange, as in both cases there is the same ample contrast between the target and its surroundings, so the AF should theoretically behave identically... But in the second case, it seems like the camera metering system provoked the FF... This sounds to me as something fishy in the AF algorithm...
I'm pretty sure this could be proved again by using two "negative" targets : one white with a black line in the middle, and the other black with a white line...
EDIT: okay, another test done...
Using a laptop LCD (daylight lighting!), I drew a slanted colored line against a black background... I lower the LCD brightness down so I'm below EV3-4...
- A green line gets a good focus (I can see individual pixels).
- Blue is slightly OOF.
- Red is totally OOF.
Christine, dlacouture made a good test and it is one on a list of additional tests I figured could help to further investigate.
However, I won't ask Pentax about it before 1.03 is out. A Hamburg technician returning from Tokyo told a German forum member that Japan is rather confident they found a way to fix it. Let's see.
dlacouture's test is compatible with my max. aperture hypothesis: The signal to determine focus phase does not depend on max. aperture nor on the difference if black on white or white on black is used. Still, the focus shift threshold does.
So, this is a second hint that the
total amount of intermediate wavelength light entering the lens does matter.
Because the phase sensor cannot use it, i've the idea that another sensor (+sensor or whatever) is at play. And because this sensor may actually be outside the AF module ( unlikely but possible), it may be tested differently too.
So, besides dlacouture's test ( a light source pointing towards the camera beneath the feature in focus was another variant ), I imagined that pointing an LED flashlight from behind into the eyepiece when focussing may be another interesting test. Just in case a +sensor is combined into the 77 zone metering. I realized that the +feature is always combined with the 77zone meter feature: There are 3 cameras with the AF+ feature (k5 k7 645d) and they all use 77 zone metering. And no camera with 77 zone metering but without the AF+ feature exists...
So, there is a chance that the isdue is related to a hypothetical 77zone AF+ sensor which fails with too little light, as emphasized by a black target or a slow lens. Why I imagined the LED flashlight into eyepiece test which seems to be an odd idea otherwise...