Originally posted by Highland "falconeye" the nuclear plants in the United States continue to be protested against as they are just as unsafe as the ones that are in any other country.
I think at least after Fukushima it would make some sense to distinguish between nuclear power plants built in earthquake regions and those which aren't. I agree however that there are enough other risks involved (like terrorist attacks) to say that no plant is safe "enough".
Nevertheless, one has to start somewhere (to shut plants down) and old type reactors in earthquake California are the perfect start. That's what I wanted to point at.