Originally posted by Tom Lusk "So for you there are 3 types of pros and that's it?: Landscape Photographers Studio photogtraphers Sport photographers"
Here's my list-
Landscape, studio, and all others, including, but not restricted to, sports and wildlife...
You see, Pentax has a deserved reputation for being a value leader. Excellent products for the $$. But there are many, I suspect, that would gladly pay more for a higher performing camera. I would, and if Pentax can't offer it soon, I'll have to switch brands, reluctantly. January will be crunch time for me.
OK - first a proviso - I DONT know the specs of the new cameras - I just suspect that Pentax are aiming where they make the most money and build up market share. In the short term it would not be sensible to go for the top of the range pro system because the market is limited. Maybe later but only when the cash flow is improved and the customer base is healthy.
So assuming they stick with the prosumer segment in the meantime you have cameras at the level of the 40D, D80, D300 and A700 representing the full extent of said segment. Where Pentax decide to pitch the new model I dont know, but I suspect they will not compete directly with any of them but will offer something a bit different and produce a worthy K10D successor. If so, and they keep the price reasonable, then it comes down to priorities.
If you were forced to choose would you rather have improvements to speed or IQ? Indeed if it IS possible to demostrate clear IQ advantages in such a closely matched segment it would be very interesting to see it. The Canon 5D demonstrated that a lot of users would put up with an average body and average performance for a really good sensor.
OTOH if the IQ is comparable but Pentax manage to up the performance, I dont think I would bother upgrading just for another couple of FPS to be honest.