Originally posted by Ayoh Personally I would rather they emphasise low light sensitivity in future designs with larger and fewer AF points, rather than target niche sports photography demands and increase AF point count.
+1!
I find that my K-5 often is imprecise in very low light (e.g. outdoor night scenes), and if I have something with reasonable contrast to focus on I get better results with CDAF. That's where AF improvements would help me too, I don't have a very urgent need for good tracking AF. That being said, I think that the K-5 is a very significant step up in AF from the K10D.
(In addition to better camera AF it would of course be nice if the 16-50 replacement from the road map is a better lens with reliable silent AF...)