Originally posted by jamarley See my previous post in this thread (#422), in which I wondered this exact same thing. In fact, Blue, I was thinking about your cup of java quip when I typed that one. Seriously, in the world of high tech and big business losing money is hardly ever a reason not to spend it when a deal such as this comes along. $140 million for a whole, prestigious camera company? Come on, that's a bargain in this economy or any other. But even saying that I can't believe Ricoh would spend this amount and sit on their corporate haunches. I expect great things coming after October 1. We can take them to task later if they let Pentax rot. But I suggest giving it a little time for Ricoh to spin up the momentum.
Originally posted by Blue I have to wonder if the 2 events are closely related. It would make a lot of sense to go ahead and do some restructuring in advance.
I think you guys are right. Its probably a big thing in Japan to lay off employees, so they don't do it without a lot of drama. In the long run, my impression is that investors are a lot more confident in companies that have plans and are doing purposeful things as opposed to those sitting around and doing nothing.
I think what they see in Pentax, is a team with good ideas, that lacks in execution. This is an easier situation to fix than a team that has no creativity at all. The sensor stain problem is a bonehead manufacturing 101 error, not a design team error. Manufacturing people should have got their hands on the first few cameras out of the plant, found all the problems and fixed them. Instead they manufactured many months of those sensor stain cameras. The low light focus problem - developing an improved function but lacking the resources to test it thoroughly prior to manufacturing. Ricoh didn't get to the top in copiers making these kinds of mistakes. They understand the problem!
I've got some extra lenses i'm going to sell off, but i'm keeping my k5 and my favoite lenses. This is going to be a fun ride.