Originally posted by johnmflores As I've mentioned before, this doesn't need to be an either/or, especially with the GXR modular concept. Imagine:
- 1 body, larger than current GXR, with CPU to handle FF and other related functions
- 1 module, standard K-mount, including FF sensor, PDAF, OVF
- 1 module, mirrorless K-mount, smaller, EVF, takes new line of K-mount lenses (K2)?
How cool would that be?
Some things that need to be remembered:
- Mirrorless is not just for small size
- Size is not just a function of the presence/absence of a mirror
- Sensor size impacts lens size. Larger sensors equal larger lenses
- Mirrorless FF size benefits most evident with primes. With zooms, lens size is a bigger influence in overall size
- As much as we here in this little forum like primes, most of the world uses zooms.
Happy new year everyone!
I agree that would be cool and allows Pentax a way forward. There seems to be a large contradiction in Pentax forum member attitudes: Many agree that mirrorless is the camera design of the future, most just don't want it now. Meanwhile i went to my camera club recently and talked to one of my friends who just converted a Nex 5 to an infrared camera and concurently bought a Nex 7. His previous camera was a Sony A900. Seems very happy with the Nex's;, and i'm meanwhile still happy with my K5, especially after stretching 3 ink-jet printed canvases yesterday, 20"x30" that came out in spectacular fashion. Lens was the DA 50-135 - love that lens!
I just get this feeling that Pentax needs to stick their toe in the mirrorless market in a more definitive way than the Q; its not that i'm unhappy with what i have, this is more of an interesting discussion to me than anything else.
anyway John, in your interesting proposal, you didn't mention whether this new larger GXR model would have body SR or lens SR, or focus motor in the lens or body. Both are decisions which i think make a difference in lens size, perhaps body size.