Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-14-2012, 03:40 AM   #301
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 5th floor
Posts: 1,328
They should do FF P & S that costs less than $1,000.

01-14-2012, 05:37 AM   #302
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 5,002
They should make them levitate so you never need a tripod. They should also make them to controlled by your thoughts. Reminds me of this song:

01-14-2012, 06:36 AM   #303
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Durham, nc
Photos: Albums
Posts: 896
Slip, is that a CX650E in your signature? Hard to tell with the watermark I run Honda CX500 and GL500 Forum!! /maybe see you around there sometime!

Charles.
01-15-2012, 03:42 PM   #304
Veteran Member
falconeye's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Munich, Alps, Germany
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,863
QuoteOriginally posted by Sinister Quote
That'll be fine with me... but I still think the easiest way would be to design a K-Mount module for the GXR...
I still have no clue why people keep asking for this. Maybe, somebody can elaborate?

AFAIK, a GXR with K module would be the same size as a K-x camera, more expensive, and worse in every aspect I am able to imagine or that a firmware upgrade won't deliver for Pentax too. So you see why I am in trouble to understand the point ...

01-16-2012, 12:47 AM   #305
Pentaxian




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Berlin
Posts: 904
Well, I would need a flat body for business travelling. Have a look at this picture:
Olympus E-P1 with Panasonic 20/1.7 vs. Pentax K-x with DA40/2.8 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
and then look at this comparison from the side: Compare camera dimensions side by side

Take of the battery bulge and the mirror and it becomes pretty small. And it is the advantage of having multiple choices: A modules, M-Mount and K-Mount!!!
01-16-2012, 05:42 AM   #306
Veteran Member
falconeye's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Munich, Alps, Germany
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,863
QuoteOriginally posted by Sinister Quote
Take of the battery bulge and the mirror and it becomes pretty small.
Exactly as I thought: people keep asking for this because they don't understand.

The Ricoh GXR with a K-module would have the exact same "bulge". You can remove the mirror but would still have to keep the air. Because the K-mount's registration distance is a constant.

BTW, my favorite size comparison is http://camerasize.com/compare/#229,258
I am a big fan of small capable cameras. But mirrorless is not enough to do the trick.
01-16-2012, 06:11 AM   #307
Loyal Site Supporter
eddie1960's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,271
QuoteOriginally posted by falconeye Quote
Exactly as I thought: people keep asking for this because they don't understand.

The Ricoh GXR with a K-module would have the exact same "bulge". You can remove the mirror but would still have to keep the air. Because the K-mount's registration distance is a constant.

BTW, my favorite size comparison is Compare camera dimensions side by side
I am a big fan of small capable cameras. But mirrorless is not enough to do the trick.
The missing dimension is the depth. the fuji is quite narrow. but it's not a small camera i agree (neither is an m9 the Mirrorless Grandaddy )

Compare camera dimensions side by side

and the fuji vs the m9 is my favourite comparison (it's pretty obvious who Fuji is Gunning for when you see them side by side - if only you could bring up the contax G2 as well to see the Fuji inspiration

Compare camera dimensions side by side
01-16-2012, 06:24 AM   #308
Pentaxian




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Berlin
Posts: 904
QuoteOriginally posted by falconeye Quote
Exactly as I thought: people keep asking for this because they don't understand.

The Ricoh GXR with a K-module would have the exact same "bulge" - I am referring to the battery bulge! You can remove the mirror but would still have t o keep the air. Because the K-mount's registration distance is a constant.

BTW, my favorite size comparison is Compare camera dimensions side by side
I am a big fan of small capable cameras. But mirrorless is not enough to do the trick.
I think you got me wrong. I am aware of the fact, that the "air" in the module itself is a non-changable constant. What I am asking for is a flat body, without the battery bulge - like an MX - which easily slips in my bag. Next to it the adapter and my FA43 or DA21 and I'd be happy. And the easiest way to achieve this, is the GXR.

01-16-2012, 10:13 AM   #309
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,311
QuoteOriginally posted by falconeye Quote
BTW, my favorite size comparison is Compare camera dimensions side by side
I am a big fan of small capable cameras. But mirrorless is not enough to do the trick.
exellent example!

The K-mount is still very capable of being small! My three FA's is very very small compared to other brands.

Also, my ist* and 43 Ltd is a very small package, much smaller than a K-r/43 combo.

I think were blessed with a great mount, mirrorles or not....

I see alot of comments about register distance. It's still pretty darn small when you attach lenses like the Ltd's.
01-16-2012, 10:28 AM - 1 Like   #310
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Durham, nc
Photos: Albums
Posts: 896
I want a mirrorless with an EVF, which I have the option of using a K adapter on.. but, I want the autofocus to work. Most of the time, I'll want a nice compact capable camera. But if I feel like a 600mm telephoto, it'd be nice if I could slap on an adapter and my 55-300mm DAL lens. When working with telephoto, a little extra length isn't a big deal. I just want the autofocus to work - if they're going to make an adapter, make one that's worth a damn.

Charles.
01-16-2012, 04:31 PM   #311
New Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
I want a new medium format film camera

01-16-2012, 04:50 PM   #312
Veteran Member
falconeye's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Munich, Alps, Germany
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,863
QuoteOriginally posted by Sinister Quote
I think you got me wrong. I am aware of the fact, that the "air" in the module itself is a non-changable constant. What I am asking for is a flat body, without the battery bulge - like an MX - which easily slips in my bag. Next to it the adapter and my FA43 or DA21 and I'd be happy. And the easiest way to achieve this, is the GXR.
Maybe, I got you wrong. I actually have the same dream, owning an MX myself.

But I had to learn that the extra bulge in an, e.g., K-5 over an MX is crowded with electronics, incl. a sensor, AA filter, SR mechanism, LCD screen and PCB boards. All of this would not go away if removing the battery grip bulge, i.e., overall depth of a K mount camera would still remain the same, a K module GXR or K adapter NEX included.

However, I see your point of removable bulge for transport reasons. If you have enough pockets to stuff the rest. I am just not sure that this is enough justification for a K mount mirrorless. If this is this important, you could design a foldable mirror box which folds tight with the mirror locked up in power off state. The fact that nobody ever tried it tells me it isn't this important.
01-17-2012, 09:00 AM   #313
Pentaxian
mecrox's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,117
QuoteOriginally posted by falconeye Quote
But I had to learn that the extra bulge in an, e.g., K-5 over an MX is crowded with electronics, incl. a sensor, AA filter, SR mechanism, LCD screen and PCB boards. All of this would not go away if removing the battery grip bulge, i.e., overall depth of a K mount camera would still remain the same, a K module GXR or K adapter NEX included.

However, I see your point of removable bulge for transport reasons. If you have enough pockets to stuff the rest. I am just not sure that this is enough justification for a K mount mirrorless. If this is this important, you could design a foldable mirror box which folds tight with the mirror locked up in power off state. The fact that nobody ever tried it tells me it isn't this important.
Well, Pentax could always make a virtue of necessity and forget about trying to make everything as slim as possible, just like every other camera. In fact they already do that with the Q anyway, but not every camera in the range has to follow suit. Instead they could produce a high-quality FF mirrorless that in shape is fairly like a reduced 645D. Eccentric? So what do they have to lose?
01-17-2012, 09:29 AM   #314
Pentaxian
gazonk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oslo area, Norway
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,512
QuoteOriginally posted by mecrox Quote
Instead they could produce a high-quality FF mirrorless that in shape is fairly like a reduced 645D. Eccentric? So what do they have to lose?
That sounds insanely eccentric, since the 645D owes its shape to the enormous mirror box.... I think if they really want to be eccentric, they can drop FF altogether and instead offer a lighter, smaller 645D-mount SLR camera with a less expensive (and lower pixel-count) sensor. A 645D for The Rest Of Us.
01-17-2012, 09:48 AM   #315
Veteran Member
eurostar's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Albareto, Italy
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 818
QuoteOriginally posted by gazonk Quote
That sounds insanely eccentric, since the 645D owes its shape to the enormous mirror box.... I think if they really want to be eccentric, they can drop FF altogether and instead offer a lighter, smaller 645D-mount SLR camera with a less expensive (and lower pixel-count) sensor. A 645D for The Rest Of Us.
Plus, they would have the lenses in production for that thing.

While the same is not true for a FF. I know that people want a FF for their old lenses, and not for new ones to buy... but i fear Ricoh is not on the same idea.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
ces, pentax news, pentax rumors
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax Expected at Las Vegas CES January 6-9 2011 bobell69 Pentax News and Rumors 26 01-12-2011 02:19 PM
Where is the Pentax news from CES 2010? KungPOW Pentax News and Rumors 29 01-19-2010 11:31 AM
Pentax at Jan 7th 2010 CES ? Samsungian Pentax News and Rumors 34 01-08-2010 03:58 PM
CES 2010 Predictions (DSLR video) jogiba Video and Pentax HDSLRs 2 01-01-2010 01:38 PM
CES in Vegas Jesus Pentax News and Rumors 25 01-09-2008 08:28 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top