Originally posted by fuent104 This is a pretty harsh assessment. To say that understanding a market = being successful in that market is a bit simplistic, in my opinion.
Kodak has introduced many digital imaging innovations over the last couple decades. Several of them were so far ahead of their time that they preceded the markets.
Bankruptcy isn't the end of the world, and Kodak will most likely continue to soldier on. I hope.
Whether we think such an assessment is harsh is not relevant. The present value of these post-retirement pension and medical obligations is greater than the net-current-value of the company's assets, therefore Kodak is insolvent on the Balance Sheet.
In order to preserve the opportunity to exploit their patent portfolio Kodak will voluntarily reorganize, allowing the Delaware Chancery Court and a Court-appointed Trustee (a Conservator) to administer the liquidation of assets and obligations in the legacy operations (Film).
The digital portfolio will emerge from the reorganization, perhaps as an independent company, perhaps captured by private investment funds or perhaps sold to a competitor.
To the extent legacy assets (Film) continues as a viable business after reorganization, they will become a cash cow to retire current and future indebtedness (asset-backed and unsecured debt, and post-retirement liabilities) that have been reduced by an orderly adjudication. Expect little future investment in Film and related businesses - they will simply fade away.
Citigroup doesn't extend $950,000,000 of debtor-in-possession financing out of sentimentality for yellow boxes. It does so because it knows it will make a profit under the protection of the Court.
Reality. The 53,000 former employees of the legacy divisions are the reason EK has entered Chapter 11. They are
former employees only because consumers bought less of the product they made.