Originally posted by Greyser Actually both are kind of semi-AF. Very often Tamron Pz-AF doesn't AF immediately and requires a few shutter button pushes or similar to 1.7X AFA pre-focusing which is even more uncomfortable due to constant lens switching from AF to MF and back. Very often your target is gone when AF kicks in.
This is true. If I don't think the bird is going to wait around for 3-5 secs then I won't use this combo and will use my 2nd K5 with whatever is on it at the time.
Originally posted by Greyser What about nasty PF for US$225?
The Pentax M 400/5.6 is really sharp and from my testing, and more importantly the opinions / shots of those on here that are using it (do a search for Designosophy, Mole and 8540Tomg - the 300+ thread is a great place to start), you just need to be aware of it's weaknesses. More often than not if shooting where the M400 is at it's worst, for small birds into the sun, then you're not going to get a result with any lens unless you enjoy a game of guess the silhouettes ! However for the money, US$200-400, there is nothing to even come close to beating it (cheaper offerings, such as 55-300 or a 500mm mirror, are not in the same ballpark).
Originally posted by Greyser I have MF Tamron 400/4. It has a very short focus adjustment ring movement. It's actually good for pre-focusing with 1.7X AFA or when you rely solely on focus confirmation beep, but doesn't work well while focusing with 140X and 200X TCs. The best solution here is Live View magnified focus, which is slow enough for wild life. I believe the 300/2.8 works very similarly.
The owner of the lens, and also on some of the other reviews, state that the Tokina 300/2.8 works extremely well with the AFA x1.7 so I've got my fingers crossed !
Originally posted by Greyser As you see all of your solutions have their own limitations. They are workable, but sometimes not very convenient and fast focusing. I expect the 560/5.6 to be better in every way. My only concern is half a meter length, if the lens is not collapsible. There are speculations about both variants, but *ogl* somewhere made a solid statement that it is not telescopic.
All lenses will have some limitations, the 560mm will be hand-holding, maybe the length for portability (if not collapsible) and possibly weight. However the possible solutions I've listed above blow the 560mm out of the water in one important regard ... they are all available now and not in one year's time (assuming the 560mm is announced this Autumn and launched next Spring)