Originally posted by eddie1960 Because there was no margin in it. Hoya addressed some of the glaring price inconsistencies, but did nothing to control the street price. then they killed any dealer incentive (ie raised minimums killed credit.....)
The US is a huge market, but in comparison to the whole world it is not. if it disrupts the rest of the larger market it needs to be fixed.
Apparently, that wasn't completely true. BH, Adorama, Abes, 17th Street, and 47th street were B&M. What Pentax didn't have was much of a warranty and support system in the U.S.A.
Originally posted by eddie1960 Kunzite also made a good point in this needed to be well established before the new product comes to market. So you are looking at 6 months of pain down there so you can have some long term gains
Roll out what? Vaporware? Move a Niche product line into a enthusiast, semi-pro, pro market without warranty and support? Maybe quietly Ricoh has increased Pentax's production capability. But if they have, it hasn't shown. This whole thing looks more like an artificially controlled supply/demand game. Since any increased profit margin is actually going to existing dealers, how is that helping R&D and production capacity?
Originally posted by eddie1960 I realise their will be markets that it is near impossible to service properly at B&M. For you it will mean waiting for the rebate programs to buy. Thing is Pentax needs to look at the health of all their channels. 1 very strong channel that is wiping out all the others is not in anyone's best interest.
The problem is, Pentax USA is far from a strong channel. Plus, enthusiasts, semi-pros and others that need to replace gear don't always have the luxury to play house-wife coupon games. On top of that, the warranty puts this thing into a wall. How many people do you expect to pay a significant surcharge just to be a Pentax fanboi?