Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-27-2012, 10:26 AM   #16
Site Supporter
Clinton's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,800
I'm really looking forward to hearing more about why this is such a bad idea.

I'm mostly just hopeful to buy this technology in the fall.

06-27-2012, 01:44 PM   #17
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,166
QuoteOriginally posted by KungPOW Quote
The camera body in the SR patent looks like a *istD to me.

I don't think this is a new body design.
the *istD did not have shake reduction but did have a full frame mirror. Besides, why would Pentax update the *istD, K20d, K-7 bodies since they are out of production.

QuoteOriginally posted by joe.penn Quote
Look at the original file dates, these look like they may be extensions:

Dec 12, 2008
July 16, 2009

Dang, was feeling a little tingly inside for a moment or two.

Of course I am no patent expert and could be wrong...
Pentax has been working on full frame off and on for at least 12 years.
06-27-2012, 08:17 PM   #18
Veteran Member
KungPOW's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,702
My point has nothing to do with teh *istD having SR or not.

People are speculating that the body shown in the patent is/might be the new FF design body.

All I'm saying is that it looks like an istD, and is therefore unlikely to be an indication of the design of any new body.

I expect the patent and R&D for this SR system was from the early MZ-D days, and the *istD body was the best choice to show in teh patent documents.
06-27-2012, 10:15 PM   #19
Pentaxian
thibs's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Photos: Albums
Posts: 5,161
Note really, they keep using liste body in patents because there is no point in telling others your new body design.
Simple as that.

06-27-2012, 10:27 PM   #20
Forum Member
LXNights's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 98
Like I said, I think you're right KungPOW, about the drawing looking like an *istD body. But I also think thibs is right, that there is no point for Pentax to show their hand on any new design until they're ready.

@ thibs: Do you think that Pentax has the patent on SR, and since now they get their sensors from Sony, that there may be a quid pro quo going on here?
06-28-2012, 06:04 AM - 1 Like   #21
Junior Member
RipDaJacker's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 28
Ffs, this is starting to feel like the long wait for Duke Nukem...
06-28-2012, 06:44 AM   #22
Senior Member




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lewiston, NY
Posts: 104
It's about as meaningful as Ford submitting a patent application for an improved windshield wiper. Protecting intellectual property has more to do with staking claim to your market turf than giving us speculators any glimpse into future products.

Now if I saw a patent application for a truly innovative and improved autofocus system, and a new camera / flash communications scheme, I'd be very excited.

Still I guess by continuing to file patents, Pentax/Ricoh is demonstrating they wish to maintain the value of their intellectual property. Good thinking if you are planning continued investments in the business. Also good thinking if you are planning to liquidate.
06-28-2012, 06:47 AM   #23
Pentaxian
Dr_who's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 686
what ever it is, it at least has a viewfinder

06-28-2012, 07:30 AM   #24
Pentaxian
Class A's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 8,934
QuoteOriginally posted by Adam Quote
This just got filed:

Digital camera
One can patent something as trivial as this?
Doesn't make sense to me.
06-28-2012, 07:50 AM   #25
Pentaxian
LFLee's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western MA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,249
Nobody read the whole thing?

It mentioned CCD sensor - could be old patent for K20D/K200D?

Lee
06-28-2012, 08:08 AM   #26
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 8,422
I only briefly/partially read it, and it seems the simultaneous scrolling/whatever of 2+ images (in image comparison mode) already implemented on some cameras.
And of course, the camera image is a generic one (based on a past model) - it does not have to be any specific product, it does not have to be updated after new products are launched.
06-28-2012, 08:34 AM   #27
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,474
QuoteOriginally posted by LFLee Quote
Nobody read the whole thing?

It mentioned CCD sensor - could be old patent for K20D/K200D?

Lee
Yeah, I caught that. Kinda chuckledabout it as I read these comments until yours.
06-28-2012, 08:40 AM   #28
Senior Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Parallax's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Dakota
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 15,107
QuoteOriginally posted by ogl Quote
rather old patents...by the way.
Rather old news.....by the way. See joe.penn's post (#4) above.
06-28-2012, 09:36 AM   #29
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 631
QuoteOriginally posted by RipDaJacker Quote
Ffs, this is starting to feel like the long wait for Duke Nukem...
Except the follow-up for this will be a much, much smaller disappointment.
06-28-2012, 12:20 PM   #30
Pentaxian
thibs's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Photos: Albums
Posts: 5,161
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
Yeah, I caught that. Kinda chuckledabout it as I read these comments until yours.
It was already the case with previous patents... they always talk about CCD but those are patents independent from the type (CCD/CMOS) of sensors so this is completely indifferent...
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, correction, image, pentax news, pentax rumors
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax Lens Patents: 12-24 f3.5-4.5 and 645 wideangles JPT Pentax News and Rumors 13 04-04-2012 03:43 AM
Two new Pentax patents Adam Pentax News and Rumors 13 01-10-2012 07:04 PM
Pentax SMC Patents transferred to Ricoh?? yakiniku General Talk 15 10-08-2011 11:10 AM
Samsung patents shallow DOF for compacts RioRico Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc. 3 07-26-2011 02:57 PM
Canon Patents 42x Zoom Lens! jogiba Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc. 4 06-28-2011 02:08 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top