Originally posted by jonny1986 i have seen some iso 3200 sample and they are not so better than those of canon 40d r nikon d300.
I'll by the camera anyway.
First, wait for some real tests about high iso and different levels of noise reduction, for now we just seen few images here and there and we don't know how they were made, if they were JPG or Raws or how they been converted.
if I shoot JPG at iso 1600 with the K100D I get a not so good image - but if I shoot raw and leave the raw untouched (no Noise reduction in RAW converter, no sharpening, no nothing ) - I get a very very good image with very small noise. Maybe the same is with the K20D.
Also the 6400iso image, doesn't look bad at all, the details are there, just some chroma noise, but that is not so bad compared to luminance noise. Look at the label on the bottle for example.