Originally posted by davemdsn Also, a $50 price reduction won't increase sales by ten fold. Would be nice if it did, but it doesn't.
I suspect you're referring to my example. My numbers were, of course, made up. I realize that a $50 price drop won't increase sales tenfold. Besides, a reduction of $50 in Pentax' profit probably translates into a retail price reduction somewhat larger than that.
My point was, and still is, that Hoya/Pentax will allow the price to drift to the point that maximizes their total profit, regardless of Hoya's remarks about having Pentax operate at higher margins. If that point is $1000, then that's where the price will stay. If that price is $600, then it will go that low. I doubt it, but if the bean counters in Tokyo (or Golden) think that that price point will maximize profits, then that's what they'll do, provided that they can build that many.
They won't drop the price simply to generate unit sales, if the price drop is so big that it offsets the increased profits of selling more units. That said, this kind of pricing decision is somewhat of a black art, rather than a science. You don't know if a price drop will increase profits until you try it and, if you're wrong, you're stuck with the decision.
I suspect that, given the success of the K10D, if the K20D is met with the same kind of market acceptance, Hoya/Pentax will resist the temptation to reduce prices very much.
Paul Noble