Originally posted by jv.pentax OK, that's right, but I'd like to have the opportunity to choose, so in case I can't afford one I can get the other, or on the contrary,
have a specific lens like Sigma's 120-300 f2.8. It's just to have a wider catalogue.
I'm using this post to illustrate a problem.
I don't think it's plausible from us to expect Pentax shall duplicate all lenses in their third parties catalogues, and sell them back to public for same or very similar price point, but with Pentax badge on them. In addition, we'd also scream for added WR, better coating, metal construction, etc. And if the price is different by $1, we'll go mad and proclaim Pentax is doomed. Or whatever else.
I think then we are nuts, and propositions like that are ridiculous.
Instead, why not something new and unique? Say, Pentax did come with DA70 and DA15. Why didn't anyone thought of that, but instead screamed for more Sigma-like lens drones? Now, DA70 et al are truly off the hook, original lens design approaches. Unique offers. Why don't more people think along those lines?