Originally posted by RiceHigh Yes, you're exactly correct for all the models listed!
Indeed
Originally posted by RiceHigh Like you, I also had a hard time to scratch my head repeatedly!
Yeah but may have needed more time to develop as it may have required some serious bodywork.
Anyways, at least you got rid of that itch on your head
Originally posted by RiceHigh Yes, slugglish low light performance and serious AF huntings, Front Focusing when shot in tungsten lightings with faster and longer lenses
Odd, I had backfocus....
Originally posted by RiceHigh , inability to trace fast moving object at a speed towards and away from the camera,
It may ofcourse depend on WHAT you shoot but if it is fast AND coming my way, my first thought would be to get the **** out of there, and only then "D**, missed a shot" But I would not be able to tell you if I missed that shot because I jumped away of because of focus...
And if it moves away it generally is not that interesting anymore. Or it it soooo exciting that I forget to shoot.
Originally posted by RiceHigh inability to trace continuously for a randomly moving object (at least as compared to Canon's and Nikon's upper DSLR models)
No problems here, not even with lawnmowerraces and tractorpulling. Have yet to try combine racing
Originally posted by RiceHigh Yes, of course they can. So, there are STILL hopes.
we agree
Originally posted by RiceHigh Nope.
Forgot what this was about
[QUOTE=RiceHigh;183701
Oh, No! :-o
[/QUOTE]
ooh yes
Another three years and Pnetax will celebrate worldwide and you may be the guest of honour.
All in all, they missed a few thing. Some if these things can really be considered a "miss"but others probably could not have been implemented in this model, I am sure a better focusing camera is under development right now. They may have waited to reklease a new model when the new AF was ready, but my guess is there'd be wailing all over that Pentax was dead.