Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!

Falcons · 03-10-2008, 05:18 AM

bt*ist · 03-10-2008, 02:29 PM

Thanks for the link - quite a detailed and interesting review!

inferno10 · 03-10-2008, 06:51 PM

I think there's a typo with the file size comparison. The review gives the same 25.6MB for both RAW (PEF) and RAW (DNG). Shouldn't PEF be smaller?

Maxington · 03-10-2008, 07:23 PM

I still don't know why there is no conclusion on that review.

ricardobeat · 03-10-2008, 07:46 PM

A bit strange. An 8 for image quality? 1500- line resolution? Yellow cast? Even PopPhoto's test showed extremely good resolution up to ISO 6400.

03-10-2008, 05:18 AM	#1
Falcons Inactive Account Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Perth Photos: Gallery Posts: 669	Aussie K20D Review. Forgive me if this is old news. Pentax K20D, digital cameras, digital photography, photography, digital slr, camera recommendation, price comparison, photographic companies, camera companies, digital camera best prices,

03-10-2008, 02:29 PM	#2
bt*ist Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: London, UK Photos: Gallery Posts: 211	Thanks for the link - quite a detailed and interesting review!

03-10-2008, 06:51 PM	#3
inferno10 Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: San Francisco, California Posts: 342	I think there's a typo with the file size comparison. The review gives the same 25.6MB for both RAW (PEF) and RAW (DNG). Shouldn't PEF be smaller?

03-10-2008, 07:23 PM	#4
Maxington Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 255	I still don't know why there is no conclusion on that review.

03-10-2008, 07:46 PM	#5
ricardobeat Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Brazil Posts: 376	A bit strange. An 8 for image quality? 1500- line resolution? Yellow cast? Even PopPhoto's test showed extremely good resolution up to ISO 6400.

Aussie K20D Review.