Originally posted by Uluru Translation is horrible ...
But we get the point; only Pentax and Canon went trough the storm, but Canon still overburdened with inventory build, or, plenty of old cameras produced they must sell.
Pentax does not have such problem because they were correctly anticipating the storm. This really proves, once and for all, that products like K-01 were limited runs to avoid exactly the problem that has happened to Canon and Nikon. And it also shows why Ricoh Imaging still produces GRs in batches, carefully weighing the situation and rather choosing to undersupply the market (which has a positive psychological side-effect, of a must-have product in high demand).
Pentax now has much more maneuvering space and speed.
The storm is only beginning. It will be a few years before the shape of a new landscape becomes fully apparent. All the camera-makers will get battered. That's partly because, as many have said, the camera market has just about reached saturation point, the world economy is unwell and the upgrade cycle has slowed a great deal since modern cameras are generally so good. The gold rush years are over for every camera company.
Maybe best to be a little careful with these figures. Companies like to show themselves in the best light and we (or most of us) are not forensic accountants. Moreover, as Thom Hogan points out, some seem to be forecasting exceptional end-of-year quarters to make up for losses, but since each company can only achieve most of this by taking growth from another company, several of these projections will turn out to be wide of the mark.
In addition, I wonder about these home market / export splits. They sound all wrong. I wonder whether the figures in that article are from each company's whole imaging or digital division, which often includes a host of other products in addition to cameras, from industrial machinery to batteries or TVs. In other words, a whole division's home/export split might be 80/20, for example, but within that the camera part's split was in fact 50/50 but this is not broken out in the figures.